Run step
Step 22: tool results
add_argument
Input
{
"name": "The argument from the reported aggregated ratings",
"stance": "for",
"claim_id": "a5665880-9436-4582-a906-e2161fe8e71a",
"description": "Pipeline-selected SAE features reach AxBench aggregated ratings near the LoRA reference for several label sets."
}{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from the reported aggregated ratings\" (for) on claim a5665880-9436-4582-a906-e2161fe8e71a. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"f1d1ebdd-6557-49f9-bc35-b0b95b948362"}add_argument
Input
{
"name": "The argument from the unmatched comparison",
"stance": "against",
"claim_id": "a5665880-9436-4582-a906-e2161fe8e71a",
"description": "The LoRA figure was quoted from AxBench on different concepts and layers, while the SAE side used concepts chosen to fit features and per-feature strength tuning."
}{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from the unmatched comparison\" (against) on claim a5665880-9436-4582-a906-e2161fe8e71a. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"5d0b7dbb-149b-4d5f-b61a-d07137400e37"}add_related_claim
Input
{
"kind": "related",
"claim_id": "a5665880-9436-4582-a906-e2161fe8e71a",
"reasoning": "A parallel attempt to rescue SAE steering on AxBench through feature selection (output score), compared against the same quoted, not re-run, AxBench baselines; the two share the same methodological weakness.",
"other_claim_id": "d3311aac-502f-4e69-ab97-53ee2b6de622"
}{"success":true,"linked":true,"link_id":"5216d421-3a98-44a7-be58-cb830f744eb0","message":"Linked a5665880-9436-4582-a906-e2161fe8e71a <-> d3311aac-502f-4e69-ab97-53ee2b6de622 (related); it now shows as a see-also on both claims."}