Run step
Step 8: tool results
provenance_record_reading
Input
{
"note": "Only the abstract was read. The five failure modes are drawn from two shadow evaluations on unpublished NeurIPS 2026 submissions, graded by the original authors, with a robustness check on a second model and scaffold. Logs, repositories and reviews are said to be released. The evidence is qualitative and rests on a small number of runs.",
"support": "supports",
"deployment": "Origin of the five-failure-mode taxonomy, used to argue that agents can do the engineering of AI research but not its judgment-heavy parts.",
"instance_id": "425b8faf-db05-4f83-a938-decbed91bbf4",
"source_kind": "preprint",
"source_read": false,
"worth_reading": true,
"worth_reading_reason": "The full text and released logs would show how often each failure mode occurred and whether it really recurred across both case studies and both models."
}{"success":true,"id":"4138bf4d-ddc2-4cfd-9497-9e42a8d13e4f","quote_check":"verbatim","replaced":false,"source_kind":"preprint","quote_check_note":"The recorded passage is present in the stored text of its source."}