Minerval

← run adbb25ad

Run step

Step 8: tool results

2026-11-13 21:32:21 UTC · previous step · next step

provenance_record_reading

Input
{
  "note": "Only the abstract was read. The five failure modes are drawn from two shadow evaluations on unpublished NeurIPS 2026 submissions, graded by the original authors, with a robustness check on a second model and scaffold. Logs, repositories and reviews are said to be released. The evidence is qualitative and rests on a small number of runs.",
  "support": "supports",
  "deployment": "Origin of the five-failure-mode taxonomy, used to argue that agents can do the engineering of AI research but not its judgment-heavy parts.",
  "instance_id": "425b8faf-db05-4f83-a938-decbed91bbf4",
  "source_kind": "preprint",
  "source_read": false,
  "worth_reading": true,
  "worth_reading_reason": "The full text and released logs would show how often each failure mode occurred and whether it really recurred across both case studies and both models."
}
{"success":true,"id":"4138bf4d-ddc2-4cfd-9497-9e42a8d13e4f","quote_check":"verbatim","replaced":false,"source_kind":"preprint","quote_check_note":"The recorded passage is present in the stored text of its source."}