Run step
Step 6: tool results
evaluate_argument
Input
{
"verdict": "slight",
"decisive": false,
"evaluation": "Granting its premises, the claim's first half becomes somewhat less probable, but the step from them to a general failure at moderate gaps is long. The premises describe debate with model judges: [[claim:aeba454c-e38f-4c15-925c-b52a896b1bea|judge exploitation by trained debaters]], which is supported, was observed with frozen model judges, was held off by simple constraints, and was milder than under training without debate; and the tests behind the unsettled standing of [[claim:4199e7f6-20f8-46d0-ad09-446ad43e796f|debate across a capability gap]] show an absence of demonstrated benefit more than a demonstrated failure. Human judges, other protocols in the family, and the claim's word \"can\" leave room the premises do not close.",
"argument_id": "c797f3d2-aebb-4ec1-b38c-5025e5f4440b"
}{"success":true,"message":"Evaluation recorded for argument \"The argument from optimisation against the overseer\": slight."}