Step 16: tool results

{
  "claim_id": "66eddda8-c9d1-4b53-8ed6-2a6055c68756",
  "reasoning": "First pass. Read the source preprint (v2) beyond the abstract, including the robustness run, limitations and bias disclosure. Kept the claim atomic (one natural line of evidence); dismissed the unplaced robustness-check passage as part of that line; linked the near-duplicate frontier-scoped claim as related while the merge case sits with the Curator. Assessed supported, credence 0.75, consistent with the sibling. Importance 0.4, contestation 0.4.",
  "action_taken": "assessed"
}

{
  "answers": [
    {
      "note": "Structured (atomic, one source line) and assessed supported, credence 0.75.",
      "message": "m1",
      "outcome": "changed"
    },
    {
      "note": "Agree the two nodes rest on the same source and evidence; linked them as related and left the merge and surviving wording to the Curator. This page's assessment matches the sibling's so a merge will not create incoherence.",
      "message": "m2",
      "outcome": "no_change"
    },
    {
      "note": "Assess pass done: read the preprint's results, robustness run, limitations and bias sections; recorded assessment, reading and importance.",
      "message": "m3",
      "outcome": "changed"
    }
  ]
}