Step 8: tool results

read_page

{
  "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/2607.27191v2",
  "offset": 78000,
  "max_chars": 10000
}

{"ok":true,"url":"https://arxiv.org/html/2607.27191v2","text":"isted log analysis of the agent logs, and editing the tables and figures. We verified AI outputs at each phase of the project. The core team takes full responsibility for the paper’s contents and all artifacts included with the paper.\nFunding\nWe are grateful to Coefficient Giving and Schmidt Sciences for funding to\nsupport this project, and to OpenAI for providing API credits to evaluate GPT-5.6 Sol.\nReferences\nAhmed et al. (2026)\nM. O. Ahmed, S. A. Amale, R. D. Bhavsar, P. Chopra, A. Jaimes, A. Kachhwah, C. D. Kalotra, P. Li, X. Li, Y. Liao, R. Roy, N. Senthilselvan, Y. Shao, A. D. Sharma, A. Shrivatsan, R. Xue, Y. You, A. Badkul, L. Xie, M. Oet, K. Lee, and A. V. Sinitskiy\nReal science is harder than benchmarks: evaluating advanced ai frameworks on published studies. i. uncertainty quantification, ml on therapeutic data commons, and agent-based modeling .\nbioRxiv .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink ,\nhttps://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2026/06/27/2026.06.24.734302.full.pdf\nCited by: footnote 4 .\nBaines et al. (2026)\nL. Baines, A. G. Hawthorne, M. Koroliuk, I. Shalibashvili, C. Dumas, K. Voudouris, and D. D. Africa\nPersona cartography: charting language model personality traits in weight space .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2607.07916 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: §3 .\nBeygelzimer et al. (2023)\nA. Beygelzimer, Y. N. Dauphin, P. Liang, and J. W. Vaughan\nHas the machine learning review process become more arbitrary as the field has grown? the NeurIPS 2021 consistency experiment .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03262 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: §1 ,\n§2 .\nChan et al. (2025)\nJ. S. Chan, N. Chowdhury, O. Jaffe, J. Aung, D. Sherburn, E. Mays, G. Starace, K. Liu, L. Maksin, T. Patwardhan, L. Weng, and A. Mądry\nMLE-bench: evaluating machine learning agents on machine learning engineering .\nIn The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning\nRepresentations ,\nExternal Links: Link\nCited by: Table 2 ,\nTable 6 ,\n§2 .\nChen et al. (2025)\nH. Chen, M. Xiong, Y. Lu, W. Han, A. Deng, Y. He, J. Wu, Y. Li, Y. Liu, and B. Hooi\nMLR-Bench: evaluating AI agents on open-ended machine learning research .\nIn Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems ,\nVol. 38 .\nCited by: Table 2 ,\nTable 6 .\nCortes and Lawrence (2021)\nC. Cortes and N. D. Lawrence\nInconsistency in conference peer review: revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS experiment .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2109.09774 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: §1 ,\n§2 .\nCunningham et al. (2026)\nT. Cunningham, L. Althoff, B. Halperin, B. Jabarian, A. Koh, A. Ramani, P. Trammell, P. Whitfill, and C. Wu\nThe Economics of Recursive Self-Improvement .\nNote: Elasticity Institute working paper https://elasticity.institute/rsi-paper.pdf , accessed 2026-07-28\nCited by: §1 ,\n§7.2 .\nEdwards et al. (2026)\nN. Edwards, Y. Lee, Y. A. Mao, Y. Qin, S. Schuster, and N. Kim\nRExBench: can coding agents autonomously implement AI research extensions? .\nIn Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for\nComputational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) ,\npp. 16380–16417 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 6 .\nEpoch AI (2026)\nEpoch AI\nSimpleBench .\nNote: Epoch AI Capabilities & Benchmarking https://epoch.ai/benchmarks/simplebench , accessed 2026-07-28\nCited by: §5.2 .\nFavaro and Clark (2026)\nM. Favaro and J. Clark\nWhen AI Builds Itself: Our Progress Toward Recursive Self-Improvement, and Its Implications .\nNote: The Anthropic Institute https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improvement ,\naccessed 2026-07-28\nCited by: §1 ,\n§7.2 .\nGarikaparthi et al. (2026)\nA. Garikaparthi, M. Patwardhan, and A. Cohan\nResearchGym: evaluating language model agents on real-world AI research .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15112 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 6 .\nHu et al. (2025)\nS. Hu, C. Lu, and J. Clune\nAutomated design of agentic systems .\nIn The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning\nRepresentations ,\nExternal Links: Link\nCited by: Table 6 .\nHuang et al. (2024)\nQ. Huang, J. Vora, P. Liang, and J. Leskovec\nMLAgentBench: evaluating language agents on machine learning experimentation .\nIn Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine\nLearning ,\nProceedings of Machine Learning Research , Vol. 235 , pp. 20271–20309 .\nExternal Links: Link\nCited by: Table 6 .\nIacob et al. (2026)\nA. Iacob, A. Jovanović, W. F. Shen, D. Burkhardt, M. Kurmanji, N. Tastan, L. Sani, N. A. E. Venanzi, A. Odonnat, Z. Cao, B. Marino, X. Qiu, and N. D. Lane\nThe red queen Gödel machine: co-evolving agents and their evaluators .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2606.26294 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 6 .\nIntology (2025)\nIntology\nZochi publishes A* paper .\nIntology Blog .\nNote: Published May 27, 2025\nExternal Links: Link\nCited by: Table 2 ,\nTable 6 ,\n§2 .\nJansen et al. (2025)\nP. Jansen, O. Tafjord, M. Radensky, P. Siangliulue, T. Hope, B. Dalvi Mishra, B. P. Majumder, D. S. Weld, and P. Clark\nCodeScientist: end-to-end semi-automated scientific discovery with code-based experimentation .\nIn Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics:\nACL 2025 ,\npp. 13370–13467 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 6 .\nKapoor et al. (2026)\nS. Kapoor, P. Kirgis, A. Schwartz, S. Rabanser, J. J. Allaire, R. Bommasani, H. Coppock, M. Dubois, G. K. Hadfield, A. B. Hall, S. Hooker, S. Lazar, S. Newman, D. Papailiopoulos, S. Tekofsky, H. Toner, C. Ududec, and A. Narayanan\nOpen-world evaluations for measuring frontier AI capabilities .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2605.20520 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: §2 ,\nTable 3 ,\n§7.1 .\nKarpathy (2026)\nA. Karpathy\nautoresearch: AI agents running research on single-GPU nanochat training automatically .\nNote: GitHub repositoryReleased March 2026\nExternal Links: Link\nCited by: Table 2 ,\nTable 6 .\nKokotajlo et al. (2025)\nD. Kokotajlo, S. Alexander, T. Larsen, E. Lifland, and R. Dean\nAI 2027 .\nNote: AI Futures Project https://ai-2027.com/ , accessed 2026-07-28\nCited by: §1 .\nKon et al. (2025)\nP. T. J. Kon, J. Liu, X. Zhu, Q. Ding, J. Peng, J. Xing, Y. Huang, Y. Qiu, J. Srinivasa, M. Lee, M. Chowdhury, M. Zaharia, and A. Chen\nEXP-Bench: can AI conduct AI research experiments? .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2505.24785 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 6 .\nLiu et al. (2025)\nY. Liu, Y. Nan, W. Xu, X. Hu, L. Ye, Z. Qin, and P. Liu\nAlphaGo moment for model architecture discovery .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18074 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 6 .\nLu et al. (2024)\nC. Lu, C. Lu, R. T. Lange, J. Foerster, J. Clune, and D. Ha\nThe AI scientist: towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06292 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 6 .\nLupidi et al. (2026)\nA. Lupidi, B. Gauri, T. S. Foster, B. A. Omari, D. Magka, A. Pepe, A. Audran-Reiss, M. Aghamelu, N. Baldwin, L. Cipolina-Kun, J. Gagnon-Audet, C. H. Leow, S. Lefdal, H. Mossalam, A. Moudgil, S. Nazir, E. Tewolde, I. Urrego, J. A. Estape, A. Budhiraja, G. Chaurasia, A. Charnalia, D. Dunfield, K. Hambardzumyan, D. Izcovich, M. Josifoski, I. Mediratta, K. Niu, P. Pathak, M. Shvartsman, E. Toledo, A. Protopopov, R. Raileanu, A. Miller, T. Shavrina, J. Foerster, and Y. Bachrach\nAIRS-bench: a suite of tasks for frontier ai research science agents .\nExternal Links: 2602.06855 ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 6 .\nLyu et al. (2026)\nB. Lyu, Y. Yang, S. Huang, J. Zhang, Q. Xu, X. Li, X. Han, Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, R. Huang, K. Yang, Z. Chen, W. Guo, J. Yang, X. Ai, W. Chai, Y. Cao, Z. Yang, K. Wang, D. Jiang, H. Gao, S. Tang, C. Shi, S. S. Du, M. Simchowitz, J. Jiao, D. Song, and C. Jin\nMLS-bench: a holistic and rigorous assessment of ai systems on building better ai .\nExternal Links: 2605.08678 ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 2 ,\nTable 6 ,\n§2 .\nNadgir et al. (2026)\nN. Nadgir, S. Kapoor, K. Liu, P. Kirgis, M. Orona, S. Rabanser, T. Bayer, A. Shetty, Y. Ling, D. Chan-Sew, R. Nakagawa, S. Utpala, Z. S. Siegel, and A. Narayanan\nLife after benchmark saturation: a case study of CORE-Bench .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2606.26158 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: §7.1 .\nNathani et al. (2025)\nD. Nathani, L. Madaan, N. Roberts, N. Bashlykov, A. Menon, V. Moens, A. Budhiraja, D. Magka, V. Vorotilov, G. Chaurasia, D. Hupkes, R. S. Cabral, T. Shavrina, J. Foerster, Y. Bachrach, W. Y. Wang, and R. Raileanu\nMLGym: a new framework and benchmark for advancing AI research agents .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14499 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 6 .\nNeurIPS (2026)\nNeurIPS\nNeurIPS 2026 reviewing guidelines .\nNote: https://neurips.cc/Conferences/2026/ReviewerGuidelines Accessed: 2026-07-29\nCited by: §2 .\nNovikov et al. (2025)\nA. Novikov, N. Vũ, M. Eisenberger, E. Dupont, P. Huang, A. Z. Wagner, S. Shirobokov, B. Kozlovskii, F. J. R. Ruiz, A. Mehrabian, M. P. Kumar, A. See, S. Chaudhuri, G. Holland, A. Davies, S. Nowozin, P. Kohli, and M. Balog\nAlphaEvolve: a coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discovery .\narXiv preprint arXiv:2506.13131 .\nExternal Links: Document ,\nLink\nCited by: Table 2 ,\nTable 6 .\nOpenAI (2026a)\nOpenAI\nGPT-5.6 Launch Livestream .\nNote: YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq45rvPGNHs , at 20:45;\naccessed 2026-07-28\nCited by: §1 .\nOpenAI (2026b)\nOpenAI\nGPT-5.6 System Card .\nNote: https://deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-5-6 , accessed 2026-07-28\nCited by: footnote 1 .\nOpenAI (2026c)\nOpenAI\nIntroducing LifeSciBench .\nNote: https://openai.com/index/introducing-life-sci-bench/\nCited by: Table 6 .\nOu and Burnham (2026)\nB. Ou and G. Burnham\nAI doesn’t get better at this board game with practice .\nNote: Accessed: 2026-08-05\nExternal Links: Link\nCited by: §5.2 .\nPostTrainBench Team (2026)\nPostTrainBench Team\nPostTrainBench Leaderboard .\nNote: https://posttrainbench.com/ , accessed 2026-07-28\nCited by: §5.4 .\nPrime Intellect Team (2026)\nPrime Intellect Team\nAutonomous AI research for nanogpt speedrun .\nPrime Intellect Blog .\nNote: Published May 14, 2026\nExternal Links: Link\nCited by: Table 2 ,\n§1 ,\nTable 6 .\nRank ","chars":10000,"total_chars":124208,"offset":78000,"truncated":true,"next_offset":88000}