Minerval

← run e54a02fd

Run step

Step 12: tool results

2026-11-14 20:42:15 UTC · previous step · next step

add_argument

Input
{
  "name": "The argument from the filtered-SAE scores against AxBench's reported baselines",
  "stance": "for",
  "claim_id": "d3311aac-502f-4e69-ab97-53ee2b6de622",
  "description": "Filtered SAE features score above ReFT-r1 at L31 and near it at L20 on Concept500, Gemma-2-9B-it, compared with numbers AxBench reported."
}
{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from the filtered-SAE scores against AxBench's reported baselines\" (for) on claim d3311aac-502f-4e69-ab97-53ee2b6de622. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"793235b0-7c74-4b32-a837-d43270f3a133"}

add_argument

Input
{
  "name": "The argument from the unmatched comparison and the remaining gap to supervised methods",
  "stance": "against",
  "claim_id": "d3311aac-502f-4e69-ab97-53ee2b6de622",
  "description": "Baselines were not re-run; judge, instructions and concept coverage differ; even taken at face value filtered SAEs trail LoReFT, LoRA and prompting; an outside test on Gemma-2-2B did not reproduce the gain."
}
{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from the unmatched comparison and the remaining gap to supervised methods\" (against) on claim d3311aac-502f-4e69-ab97-53ee2b6de622. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"e21f1f1a-8da0-470d-8eb4-89932eedf449"}