Step 12: tool results

add_argument

{
  "name": "The argument from the three-setup head-to-head comparison",
  "stance": "for",
  "claim_id": "846a4d41-3752-45ed-9210-b4177d75b5e9",
  "description": "Kempf et al. (2026) ran both pipelines on the same three model pairs and scored them with held-out judge metrics and autoraters."
}

{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from the three-setup head-to-head comparison\" (for) on claim 846a4d41-3752-45ed-9210-b4177d75b5e9. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"62410a2b-7823-4525-b7fb-92492d436f4f"}

add_argument

{
  "name": "The argument from evaluation by LLM judges sharing the LLM pipeline's model",
  "stance": "against",
  "claim_id": "846a4d41-3752-45ed-9210-b4177d75b5e9",
  "description": "All quality scores come from LLM judges and autoraters, and the verification judge is the same model that generates the LLM-based hypotheses, so 'comparable' may not hold under human or independent evaluation."
}

{"success":true,"message":"Created argument \"The argument from evaluation by LLM judges sharing the LLM pipeline's model\" (against) on claim 846a4d41-3752-45ed-9210-b4177d75b5e9. Attach its subclaim edges, then give it a written form with write_argument, and evaluate it with evaluate_argument when you record the claim's assessment.","argument_id":"cf14b884-312e-48ee-bc52-d00859298e17"}