Run step

Step 16: tool results

2026-11-14 20:43:59 UTC · previous step · next step

place_argument_passage

Input

{
  "stance": "advances",
  "reading": "full",
  "argument_id": "62410a2b-7823-4525-b7fb-92492d436f4f",
  "instance_id": "0bffbda7-9cdc-424b-ae78-a76d5a0296e2"
}

{"success":true,"instance_id":"0bffbda7-9cdc-424b-ae78-a76d5a0296e2","message":"Placed the passage on argument \"The argument from the three-setup head-to-head comparison\" as a advances instance."}

place_argument_passage

Input

{
  "stance": "advances",
  "reading": "premise_unstated",
  "argument_id": "62410a2b-7823-4525-b7fb-92492d436f4f",
  "instance_id": "c0f0f8e8-0dc5-48fa-90fa-399cd2787b7a"
}

{"success":true,"deduplicated":true,"instance_id":"0bffbda7-9cdc-424b-ae78-a76d5a0296e2","message":"This source already has an instance of the argument (0bffbda7-9cdc-424b-ae78-a76d5a0296e2); the passage was dismissed as a duplicate."}

record_argument_instance

Input

{
  "url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.10371",
  "title": "Simple LLM Baselines are Competitive for Model Diffing",
  "stance": "mentions",
  "context": "Limitations section of the paper reporting the comparison.",
  "speaker": "Kempf, Schrodi, Cywiński, Brox, Nanda, Conmy",
  "argument_id": "cf14b884-312e-48ee-bc52-d00859298e17",
  "source_date": "2026-02-10",
  "source_kind": "preprint",
  "verbatim_text": "Automatic evaluation has inherent limitations: LLM judges can be unreliable, and while our metrics provide valuable signal, they cannot guarantee hypothesis quality. Manual verification of high-impact hypotheses remains essential."
}

{"source_kind":"preprint","success":true,"instance_id":"059453e4-add5-4581-a51e-67a7d592c506","source_id":"a5178d56-97c3-499f-9ce3-1d7fe1dad10e","message":"Recorded a mentions instance of argument \"The argument from evaluation by LLM judges sharing the LLM pipeline's model\" from https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.10371."}

set_claim_importance

Input

{
  "claim_id": "846a4d41-3752-45ed-9210-b4177d75b5e9",
  "reasoning": "A specific methodological result inside the live debate over whether SAEs earn their cost relative to simple baselines in interpretability; consequential for practitioners choosing diffing tools but resting on one preprint and not widely disputed in print.",
  "importance": 0.35,
  "contestation": 0.3
}

{"success":true,"message":"Importance of claim 846a4d41-3752-45ed-9210-b4177d75b5e9 set to 0.35. Contestation recorded as 0.3."}