Run step
Step 14: tool results
place_argument_passage
Input
{
"reading": "full",
"argument_id": "b49bfc49-3217-4c46-92cd-67126f735d46",
"instance_id": "2f345cb7-7148-4cbf-ace7-096428af3317"
}{"success":true,"instance_id":"2f345cb7-7148-4cbf-ace7-096428af3317","message":"Placed the passage on argument \"The argument from public-private discrepancies\" as a advances instance."}place_argument_passage
Input
{
"reading": "full",
"argument_id": "b49bfc49-3217-4c46-92cd-67126f735d46",
"instance_id": "a6a06f93-78a0-46c0-a03f-02e317680668"
}{"success":true,"deduplicated":true,"instance_id":"2f345cb7-7148-4cbf-ace7-096428af3317","message":"This source already has an instance of the argument (2f345cb7-7148-4cbf-ace7-096428af3317); the passage was dismissed as a duplicate."}set_claim_importance
Input
{
"claim_id": "035fd231-0c50-4498-835c-247c8f1eac56",
"reasoning": "Bears on the trustworthiness of a frontier lab's public safety reporting and on whether an RSP early-warning threshold was crossed; widely covered in the press. Contestation is moderate-low: Anthropic has not disputed METR's review publicly, and its co-founder said many conclusions match his own.",
"importance": 0.45,
"contestation": 0.3
}{"success":true,"message":"Importance of claim 035fd231-0c50-4498-835c-247c8f1eac56 set to 0.45. Contestation recorded as 0.3."}