Run step
Step 8: tool results
update_claim_instance
Input
{
"speaker": "METR (Tom Cunningham, Nate Rush, Parker Whitfill, Hjalmar Wijk)",
"claim_id": "035fd231-0c50-4498-835c-247c8f1eac56",
"reasoning": "Read the review whole: the executive summary states this verbatim as METR's conclusion; authors named in footnote 1.",
"confidence": 1,
"instance_id": "eac2802a-12dd-4287-97ca-32e71eea3d3e",
"publication": "METR Blog",
"source_date": "2026-11-05"
}{"success":true,"instance_id":"eac2802a-12dd-4287-97ca-32e71eea3d3e","updated":["confidence","speaker","publication","sourceDate"],"message":"Updated instance eac2802a-12dd-4287-97ca-32e71eea3d3e of claim 035fd231-0c50-4498-835c-247c8f1eac56 (confidence=1, speaker=\"METR (Tom Cunningham, Nate Rush, Parker Whitfill, Hjalmar Wijk)\", publication=\"METR Blog\", sourceDate=\"2026-11-05\"); the correction and your reasoning are in the claim's audit trail. Its stance and confidence now feed your assessment as corrected."}provenance_record_reading
Input
{
"note": "The review sets passages of the public report beside passages of the private, unredacted version Anthropic shared, and shows three places where the public text is more confident than the private one: a leading-indicator speedup the private figures put at about 1.97 is described publicly as less than a factor of 2; the private report calls it plausible that AI-attributable speedup exceeds 2x while the public one implies more confidence; and the public report omits Anthropic's private expectation that later Model 2 snapshots would score higher on its capability index, which they did. The private quotations are partly redacted and the 1.97 figure is the reviewers' own calculation, so readers cannot check these numbers; Anthropic approved the published text and its co-founder said many of the conclusions match his own.",
"support": "evidence_not_shown",
"deployment": "The headline conclusion of a commissioned review of the automated R&D section of Anthropic's August 2026 Risk Report.",
"instance_id": "eac2802a-12dd-4287-97ca-32e71eea3d3e",
"source_kind": "report",
"source_read": true,
"worth_reading": true,
"worth_reading_reason": "It is the only source with sight of both the public and private reports; its side-by-side quotations are the evidence the claim rests on."
}{"success":true,"id":"a2c21a79-b258-45e7-aaac-386bdd84eac6","quote_check":"verbatim","replaced":false,"source_kind":"report","quote_check_note":"The recorded passage is present in the stored text of its source."}record_source_interest
Input
{
"party": "METR",
"scope": "claim",
"stake": "METR wrote the review under a contract with Anthropic, which asked for it and held rights to redact non-public information before publication; METR's disclosures refer to its holistic assessment for conflict-of-interest and contract details.",
"claim_id": "035fd231-0c50-4498-835c-247c8f1eac56",
"source_id": "0dea0a35-a2dc-4d27-a7fa-9d4431940f49"
}{"success":true,"id":"790c4d7f-ee05-42e0-b28f-d45d036a9288","source_id":"0dea0a35-a2dc-4d27-a7fa-9d4431940f49","claim_id":"035fd231-0c50-4498-835c-247c8f1eac56","party":"METR","stake":"METR wrote the review under a contract with Anthropic, which asked for it and held rights to redact non-public information before publication; METR's disclosures refer to its holistic assessment for conflict-of-interest and contract details.","recorded_at":"2026-11-14T02:36:41.112Z","supersedes_earlier":false,"note":"Recorded for this claim. It is shown beside this source's instances on the claim's page, and on the source's page. The record is a fact about the source: what the source says is still evidence, and how the stake bears on a claim is said in that claim's reasoning."}