Step 18: tool results

{
  "claim_id": "fc567967-00d4-456b-b196-d188db1187c4",
  "reasoning": "Read Sections 5.3, 5.4 and 7 of arXiv 2503.10965. Created one argument for the claim (SAE succeeds where semantic search fails) and one against (surface-similarity confound). Placed both unplaced passages. Assessed as supported (0.65), credence 0.7. No subclaims: the claim rests on a single study, and the premises live in the argument prose. Importance set to 0.5, contestation 0.55. The dependent question has no assessment yet, so no notification was sent.",
  "action_taken": "first_assessment"
}

{
  "answers": [
    {
      "note": "Structured with two arguments and assessed as supported.",
      "message": "m1",
      "outcome": "changed"
    },
    {
      "note": "Established from 2503.10965: the knowledge to be revealed (the learned RM-bias objective), the change of context (synthetic docs vs. bias demonstrations and the Assistant token), the SAE findings (a 1M SAE trained on the pretraining corpus including the synthetic docs; bias features on 96% and 91% of Assistant tokens), and the non-SAE baseline (semantic search with a small open-model embedder, which matched the SAE on AI-behaviour queries but failed on demonstrations and the Assistant token). No logit-lens baseline was run, and prompting was not compared on the same task. Assessed as supported, credence 0.7.",
      "message": "m2",
      "outcome": "changed"
    }
  ]
}