Run step
Step 4: tool results
get_claim_instances
Input
{
"claim_id": "738d9786-0b87-4b75-9c33-cabe43c903d5"
}{
"claim_id": "738d9786-0b87-4b75-9c33-cabe43c903d5",
"total": 1,
"limit": 20,
"offset": 0,
"has_more": false,
"instances": [
{
"id": "9b4840a6-77c5-448e-8caa-b6477b7c8149",
"source_id": "b45014e2-63ec-41af-8a6f-59db01b1e0fc",
"verbatim_text": "Additionally,\nalthough SAEs initially\nappear promising for identifying spurious correla-\ntions, detecting poor dataset quality, and training\nmulti-token probes, we are able to achieve simi-\nlar results with simple non-SAE baselines as well.",
"context": "Abstract; case studies on GLUE CoLA label errors and a spurious punctuation feature in AI-vs-human text.",
"stance": "affirms",
"confidence": 0.7,
"speaker": null,
"publication": null,
"source_date": null,
"link": null,
"source_title": "Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing",
"source_type": "preprint",
"source_url": "https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.16681",
"source_published_date": "2025-02-23",
"source_authors": [
"Kantamneni, Subhash",
"Engels, Joshua",
"Rajamanoharan, Senthooran",
"Tegmark, Max",
"Nanda, Neel"
],
"source_publisher": "arXiv.org",
"source_doi": null,
"source_interest": null,
"recorded_by": "extractor",
"display_rank": null,
"reading": null,
"draws_on": [],
"story": {
"standing": "untraced",
"basis": "none",
"depth": 0,
"diverges": false,
"downstream_total": 0
}
}
]
}