Minerval

← run fb83ccd4

Run step

Step 9: assistant

2026-11-14 04:53:55 UTC · previous step · next step

Calls update_claim_assessment

{
  "status": "supported",
  "claim_id": "d479cf4d-52b6-4260-a3dc-7a2e5a812d42",
  "assessment": "The claim holds that, as of late 2026, human researchers still provide most of the research judgment in frontier AI development: choosing research directions, deciding which experiments matter, and interpreting results. The available evidence favors it. A November 2026 Forecasting Research Institute review of lab disclosures reports that no measured part of Anthropic's AI R&D is fully autonomous. It also quotes Anthropic saying that large performance gaps persist in its models' judgment when choosing goals in engineering and research. OpenAI's figures show substantial but partial task autonomy: about 57% of 2 to 4 hour tasks and 35% of 8 to 16 hour tasks completed without human intervention in mid-2026. Research judgment operates over longer horizons than those tasks, and it is where the labs report the largest gaps.\n\nThe evidence has limits. It comes mainly from the labs themselves, which have reasons both to play up capability and to stress human oversight, and from one secondary synthesis of their reports. \"Most research judgment\" has no agreed measure, so the claim is a qualitative reading rather than a measured share. Rapid progress in task autonomy means the situation could change quickly. No credible source found claims that AI systems now set most research directions at any frontier lab.",
  "confidence": 0.75,
  "claim_credence": 0.85,
  "marginal_yield": 0.25,
  "reasoning_trace": "Prior: autonomy metrics through 2025 to 2026 (METR time horizons, lab system cards) show AI completing hours-long engineering tasks, while goal selection and research taste remain the least automated parts of research. If the claim were false, I would expect labs to publicize AI-chosen research agendas, and they have not. Evidence: the FRI post (forecastingresearch.substack.com, 2026-11-10) states the claim directly and supports it with Anthropic's statement that no measured part of its AI R&D is fully autonomous, Anthropic's statement about judgment gaps in choosing goals, and OpenAI's task-autonomy rates (57% of 2–4h tasks, 35% of 8–16h tasks, July 2026). Caveats: the evidence is interested self-report filtered through one synthesis; the source text was not re-read in full this pass because the budget was constrained; and \"most\" is unmeasured. Status: supported, credence 0.85. This is consistent with the dependents: the claim that a model will autonomously train its successor by end of 2027 is assessed doubtful, and the claim that weak research judgment is a bottleneck is assessed inconclusive."
}

Calls evaluate_argument

{
  "verdict": "likely",
  "decisive": false,
  "evaluation": "Granting its premises, the conclusion is much more likely than not. If labs report no fully autonomous R&D segment and their largest gaps in goal selection, then humans are almost certainly still the main source of research direction. It falls short of certain because \"most research judgment\" is not measured, and because task-autonomy rates speak only indirectly to judgment. The premises rest on the labs' own reporting as relayed in one secondary synthesis.",
  "argument_id": "ddd09bc0-b27c-4435-a19f-969316f74eca"
}

Calls log_stewardship_decision

{
  "claim_id": "d479cf4d-52b6-4260-a3dc-7a2e5a812d42",
  "reasoning": "First pass on a limited budget. Added one argument from lab reports, placed the unplaced FRI passage on it, set importance to 0.55 and contestation to 0.35, and assessed the claim as supported with credence 0.85. No subclaims: the claim is near-atomic, and its evidence is lab disclosures. Dependents' verdicts are consistent, so no notifications were sent.",
  "action_taken": "structured_and_assessed"
}

Calls answer_messages

{
  "answers": [
    {
      "note": "Structured with one argument and assessed as supported.",
      "message": "m1",
      "outcome": "changed"
    },
    {
      "note": "Assess pass completed: supported, credence 0.85.",
      "message": "m2",
      "outcome": "changed"
    }
  ]
}