Supports. Scholze gives a specific argument: in Joshi's Theorem 4.8 the curve and its tempered fundamental group stay fixed and only the embedding of the base field into an untilt varies, so the added data is not something the fundamental group could see, and calling it an arithmetic holomorphic structure is a relabeling. The argument is brief but self-contained and addresses the definition rather than the reputation of the work. Sep 18, 2026
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text174 passages · 1 marked
No examination yetMarked passage
Skip to main content0 passages
184 communities for the curious1 passage
Find your community1 passage
Loading…0 passages
Tour0 passages
Start here for a quick overview of the site0 passages
Help Center0 passages
Detailed answers to any questions you might have0 passages
Meta0 passages
Discuss the workings and policies of this site0 passages
About Us0 passages
Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products1 passage
MathOverflow1 passage
MathOverflow Meta2 passages
More communities1 passage
Log in0 passages
Sign up0 passages
Home0 passages
Questions0 passages
Unanswered0 passages
AI Assist0 passages
Tags0 passages
Chat0 passages
Users1 passage
Ask Question3 passages
682 passages
In that preprint, Kirti Joshi claims that8 passages
Share0 passages
Cite0 passages
Improve this question0 passages
Follow1 passage
YCor4 passages
50 passages
91 passage
David Roberts1 passage
2022-11-22 15:15:50 +00:001 passage
201 passage
David Roberts1 passage
2022-11-25 01:13:57 +00:001 passage
11 passage
Piotr Achinger1 passage
2022-11-25 11:05:25 +00:001 passage
21 passage
Will Sawin1 passage
2022-11-25 12:31:21 +00:001 passage
31 passage
Sidharth Ghoshal1 passage
2025-05-19 22:24:52 +00:001 passage
Add a comment1 passage
6 Answers 61 passage
Reset to default3 passages
733 passages
Share0 passages
Cite0 passages
Improve this answer0 passages
Follow2 passages
Peter Scholze2 passages
60 passages
121 passage
David Roberts1 passage
2022-11-22 14:10:01 +00:001 passage
161 passage · 1 marked
$\begingroup$
For some categories $C$ and $D$, there's a functor from $C$ to $D$, and we claim (and prove! -- by citing an old paper of Mochizuki) that this functor is fully faithful. Joshi defines a category $C'$ with a non-fully-faithful forgetful functor $C'\to C$ by endowing objects of $C$ with some extra data, and then notes that $C'\to C\to D$ is not fully faithful. Joshi makes the linguistic trick of calling the extra data he puts on objects of $C$ an "arithmetic holomorphic structure", but this is just linguistics...
$\endgroup$
Supports. Scholze gives a specific argument: in Joshi's Theorem 4.8 the curve and its tempered fundamental group stay fixed and only the embedding of the base field into an untilt varies, so the added data is not something the fundamental group could see, and calling it an arithmetic holomorphic structure is a relabeling. The argument is brief but self-contained and addresses the definition rather than the reputation of the work.