The Data are Insufficient to Confidently Root the SARS-CoV-2 Phylogenetic Tree
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗Archived copy
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text
No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.
I also demonstrate clear evidence of bias among the earliest available sequences, and explain why the root of the SARS-CoV-2 tree cannot be conclusively resolved with the current data. ... Here, I explain why the data are still insufficient to confidently root the tree, and discuss how biases in the available early sequences and possible reversion mutations could affect efforts to root the tree.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
For SARS-CoV-2, these two basic rooting principles are in conflict: the first collected sequences (which are mostly from people who visited or worked at the Huanan Market) are not the sequences that are most similar to SARS-CoV-2's bat coronavirus relatives.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 2 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/42/6/msaf118/8158589
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20260226142013/https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/42/6/msaf118/8158589
- Stored text
- None; quoted passages only
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 9, 2026
History 2
- Nov 9, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 7, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored