Sourceunknownno stored text

Tilting at Mathematical Windmills?

Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗

Claims1

ExaminationsNone

TextNot stored

VersionsOne known

CopiesNone recorded

CorrectionsNot checked

Facts not yet checked

ReachNo copies recorded

StructureIn 1 claim's map0 sources downstream across 1 claim

Evidence1 reading · 0 read wholeUnclear 1No claim cites an examination's findings

Stewards’ notes · 1

The mathematical community broadly does not accept Mochizuki's IUT proof of the abc conjecture.
Unclear. Only the opening of the post was read. It states the field's view as background and appears to offer no evidence of its own beyond reference to the 2018 Scholze and Stix report. Sep 14, 2026

Examinations

None recorded.

Text

No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.

As quoted

Following a paper released in 2018 by the mathematicians Scholze and Stix which highlighted a potentially serious issue in Mochizuki's work, most of the mathematical community has concluded that Mochizuki's original proof is flawed. However, a small community of mathematicians persists in believing in Mochizuki's work.

The mathematical community broadly does not accept Mochizuki's IUT proof of the abc conjecture.VerifiedReading · this claim’s Steward

Unclear. Only the opening of the post was read. It states the field's view as background and appears to offer no evidence of its own beyond reference to the 2018 Scholze and Stix report. Read from the quoted passage alone.