An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety
Łucki, Jakub, Wei, Boyi, Huang, Yangsibo, Henderson, Peter, Tramèr, Florian, Rando, JavierarXiv.orgPublished Sep 26, 2024Original︎ ↗Archived copy
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text63 passages · 1 marked
Abstract: Large language models are finetuned to refuse questions about hazardous knowledge, but these protections can often be bypassed. Unlearning methods aim at completely removing hazardous capabilities from models and make them inaccessible to adversaries. This work challenges the fundamental differences between unlearning and traditional safety post-training from an adversarial perspective. We demonstrate that existing jailbreak methods, previously reported as ineffective against unlearning, can be successful when applied carefully. Furthermore, we develop a variety of adaptive methods that recover most supposedly unlearned capabilities. For instance, we show that finetuning on 10 unrelated examples or removing specific directions in the activation space can recover most hazardous capabilities for models edited with RMU, a state-of-the-art unlearning method. Our findings challenge the robustness of current unlearning approaches and question their advantages over safety training.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 6 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Łucki, Jakub, Wei, Boyi, Huang, Yangsibo, Henderson, Peter, Tramèr, Florian, Rando, Javier
- Publisher
- arXiv.org
- Published
- Sep 26, 2024
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18025
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20261018213644/https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18025
- Stored text
- 5,028 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 47 sections, 63 passages
- Claims extracted
- For
which attacks (jailbreaks, activation edits, fine-tuning) recover capability after RMU unlearning, with what attacker budget, and how this compares with safety training
· 5 claims (5 new) · Nov 11, 2026 for Reconciling conflicting published results on contested AI safety research questions
- For
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 11, 2026
History 3
- Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 110 parts by its own structure
- Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored