RepSelect: Robust LLM Unlearning via Representation Selectivity
Sondej, Filip, Yang, Yushi, Mahdi, AdamarXiv.orgPublished Jun 15, 2026Original︎ ↗Archived copy
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text54 passages · 1 marked
Abstract: When LLM weights are open or fine-tuning is available through an API, suppressing hazardous knowledge and tendencies is not enough: removal has to be deep enough that an adversary cannot restore it. Existing unlearning is shallow by this standard: fine-tuning or a handful of in-context examples brings the behaviour back, and it often degrades general capabilities in the process. We identify a root cause: existing methods edit representations shared with the retain set and lying in the subspace that a fine-tuning attacker recovers, making unlearning simultaneously easy to undo and disruptive. Leveraging this, we propose RepSelect (Representation Selectivity), which isolates forget-set-specific representations by collapsing the top principal components of the weight gradients before each unlearning update, preserving general capabilities while limiting what fine-tuning can recover. Across five unlearning datasets spanning both knowledge (biohazard, cyber, facts about real individuals) and tendencies (abusive, sycophantic), and three model families covering dense and Mixture-of-Experts architectures, RepSelect yields a 4-40x larger drop in post-relearning answer probability than five widely used baselines (GradDiff, NPO, SimNPO, RMU, UNDIAL). It is also near-perfectly robust to few-shot prompting and holds under an adaptive attack designed to exploit its mechanism. Our results show that unlearning needs to be selective about which representations it edits.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 5 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Sondej, Filip, Yang, Yushi, Mahdi, Adam
- Publisher
- arXiv.org
- Published
- Jun 15, 2026
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17168
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20260618032544/https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17168
- Stored text
- 4,930 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 45 sections, 54 passages
- Claims extracted
- For
how the method and five baseline unlearning methods fared under relearning and few-shot attacks, on which datasets and models, and the account given of why baselines are reversible
· 6 claims (5 new) · Nov 11, 2026 for Reconciling conflicting published results on contested AI safety research questions
- For
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 11, 2026
History 3
- Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 99 parts by its own structure
- Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored