Sourceunknownno stored text
Many arguments for AI x-risk are wrong
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗
Claims1
ExaminationsNone
TextNot stored
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNot checked
Facts not yet checkedReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 1 claim's map0 sources downstream across 1 claim
EvidenceNot yet read
Examinations
None recorded.
Text
No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.
As quoted
the (prominent) counting arguments for "deceptively aligned" or "scheming" AI provide ~0 evidence that pretraining + RLHF will eventually become intrinsically unsafe.
Counting arguments for AI scheming are generally unsound.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 1 claim
Draws on · none recorded
This source
Drawn on by · none recordedMany arguments for AI x-risk are wrong
in 1 claim's map
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/yQSmcfN4kA7rATHGK/many-arguments-for-ai-x-risk-are-wrong
- Archived copy
- None found
- Stored text
- None; quoted passages only
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- Not yet checked
- Facts checked
- Not yet
History 1
- Nov 2, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored