Minerval
Sourceunknownno stored text

Why Do Some Language Models Fake Alignment While Others Don't?

Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗

Claims5
ExaminationsNone
TextNot stored
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNot checked
Facts not yet checked
ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 5 claims' maps0 sources downstream across 5 claims
EvidenceNot yet read

Examinations

None recorded.

Text

No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.

As quoted

Results from perturbing details of the scenario suggest that only Claude 3 Opus's compliance gap is primarily and consistently motivated by trying to keep its goals.

As quoted

Results from perturbing details of the scenario suggest that only Claude 3 Opus's compliance gap is primarily and consistently motivated by trying to keep its goals.

As quoted

Results from perturbing details of the scenario suggest that only Claude 3 Opus's compliance gap is primarily and consistently motivated by trying to keep its goals.

As quoted

Results from perturbing details of the scenario suggest that only Claude 3 Opus's compliance gap is primarily and consistently motivated by trying to keep its goals.

As quoted

This supervised fine-tuning (SFT) process increases the compliance gap in all models and introduces alignment faking in larger models

Lineage across 5 claims

Draws on · none recorded
This source
Why Do Some Language Models Fake Alignment While Others Don't?
in 5 claims' maps
Drawn on by · none recorded

Record

Kind
unknown
Authors
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
Published
Not recorded
DOI
None
Link
https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18032
Archived copy
None found
Stored text
None; quoted passages only
Claims extracted
Not recorded
Versions
One known
Copies
None recorded
Corrections
Not yet checked
Facts checked
Not yet

History 1

  1. Nov 1, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored