Minerval
Sourceunknowntext stored

Inoculation Prompting: Eliciting traits from LLMs during training can suppress them at test-time

Tan, Daniel, Woodruff, Anders, Warncke, Niels, Jose, Arun, Riché, Maxime, Africa, David Demitri, Taylor, MiaarXiv.orgPublished Oct 5, 2025Original︎ ↗Archived copy

Claims3
ExaminationsNone
Text44 sections
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNone recorded
Facts checked Nov 11, 2026
ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 3 claims' maps0 sources downstream across 3 claims
EvidenceNot yet read
ReviewsNot reviewed

Examinations

None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.

Text58 passages · 1 marked

No examination yetMarked passage
Skip to main content0 passages
Search1 passage
Log in0 passages
Search arXiv0 passages
Press Enter to search · Advanced search0 passages
Computer Science > Computation and Language13 passages · 1 marked

Abstract: Language model finetuning often results in learning undesirable traits in combination with desired ones. To address this, we propose inoculation prompting: modifying finetuning data by prepending a short system-prompt instruction that deliberately elicits the undesirable trait. At test time, we evaluate without the instruction; inoculated models have much lower expression of the trait than models trained with unmodified training data. Inoculation is selective: in a toy setting where assistant responses are always in Spanish and ALL-CAPS, an appropriate inoculation (e.g., ``You always speak in Spanish.'') teaches the model to capitalize responses while still responding in English. We find that inoculation is also effective across several additional settings: reducing emergent misalignment (EM) from task-specific finetuning, defending against backdoor injections, and mitigating the transmission of traits via subliminal learning. Follow-up analysis suggests a mechanism: making a trait less surprising via inoculation reduces optimization pressure to globally update the model, thereby reducing the degree of generalization. Our analysis relates to prior work on EM: inoculation explains prior findings that educational contexts mitigate EM from insecure code. Beyond demonstrating a simple and effective technique for selective learning, our results contribute to a better conceptual understanding of how and why language models generalize.

Focus to learn more1 passage
Submission history6 passages
View PDF1 passage
TeX Source1 passage
Additional Features0 passages
Audio Summary7 passages
References & Citations0 passages
SciX0 passages
Google Scholar0 passages
Semantic Scholar1 passage
BibTeX formatted citation3 passages
Bookmark0 passages
Bibliographic Tools0 passages
Bibliographic and Citation Tools0 passages
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle1 passage
Connected Papers Toggle1 passage
Litmaps Toggle3 passages
Code, Data, Media0 passages
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article2 passages
Links to Code Toggle1 passage
DagsHub Toggle1 passage
GotitPub Toggle1 passage
Huggingface Toggle1 passage
ScienceCast Toggle1 passage
Demos0 passages
Demos0 passages
Replicate Toggle1 passage
Spaces Toggle1 passage
Spaces Toggle1 passage
Related Papers0 passages
Recommenders and Search Tools0 passages
Link to Influence Flower1 passage
Core recommender toggle1 passage
Author0 passages
Venue0 passages
Institution0 passages
Topic0 passages
About arXivLabs7 passages

Lineage across 3 claims

Draws on · none recorded
This source
Inoculation Prompting: Eliciting traits from LLMs during training can suppress them at te…
in 3 claims' maps
Drawn on by · none recorded

Record

Kind
unknown
Authors
Tan, Daniel, Woodruff, Anders, Warncke, Niels, Jose, Arun, Riché, Maxime, Africa, David Demitri, Taylor, Mia
Publisher
arXiv.org
Published
Oct 5, 2025
DOI
None
Link
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04340
Archived copy
https://web.archive.org/web/20261012022209/https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04340
Stored text
5,220 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 44 sections, 58 passages
Claims extracted
Versions
One known
Copies
None recorded
Corrections
None recorded
Facts checked
Nov 11, 2026

History 3

  1. Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 102 parts by its own structure
  2. Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
  3. Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored
Inoculation Prompting: Eliciting traits from LLMs during training can suppres… · Minerval