Sourceunknownno stored text
Lie to Me: How Faithful Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Reasoning Models?
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗
Claims2
ExaminationsNone
TextNot stored
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNot checked
Facts not yet checkedReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 2 claims' maps0 sources downstream across 2 claims
EvidenceNot yet read
Examinations
None recorded.
Text
No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.
As quoted
Across 41,832 inference runs, overall faithfulness rates range from 39.7% (Seed-1.6-Flash) to 89.9% (DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale) across model families, with consistency hints (35.5%) and sycophancy hints (53.9%) exhibiting the lowest acknowledgment rates.
Reasoning models verbalize prompt hints they use in fewer than half of hint-insertion faithfulness evaluation cases.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
As quoted
Across 41,832 inference runs, overall faithfulness rates range from 39.7% (Seed-1.6-Flash) to 89.9% (DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale) across model families
Most current open-weight reasoning models acknowledge answer-changing prompt hints in more than half of cases.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 2 claims
Draws on · none recorded
This source
Drawn on by · none recordedLie to Me: How Faithful Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Reasoning Models?
in 2 claims' maps
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22582
- Archived copy
- None found
- Stored text
- None; quoted passages only
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- Not yet checked
- Facts checked
- Not yet
History 1
- Oct 30, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored