Assessing Uncertainty in the Rooting of the SARS-CoV-2 Phylogeny
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗Archived copy
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text
No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.
These results suggest that phylogenetic evidence alone is unlikely to identify the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and we caution against strong inferences regarding the early spread of the virus based solely on such evidence.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
The molecular clock rooting places the root in the B clade with high confidence, whereas outgroup rooting places the root in the A clade with similarly high confidence. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear... Although molecular clock rooting and the outgroup rooting strategies internally give qualitatively similar results, they are largely incompatible with each other.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 2 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/38/4/1537/6028993
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20250424134348/https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/38/4/1537/6028993
- Stored text
- None; quoted passages only
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 9, 2026
History 2
- Nov 9, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 8, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored