Sourceunknowntext stored
Low-stakes alignment
paulfchristianoDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗Archived copy
Claims1
ExaminationsNone
Text50 sections
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNone recorded
Facts checked Nov 11, 2026ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 1 claim's map0 sources downstream across 1 claim
EvidenceNot yet read
ReviewsNot reviewed
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text103 passages · 1 marked
No examination yetMarked passage
45
The main substantive claim is that we don’t need to worry about the “distributional shift” between past decisions and future decisions. When the distribution of inputs change, the system may behave poorly for a while, but if we keep retraining on the new data then it will eventually adapt. If individual decisions are low stakes, then the total cost of all of this adaptation is small. I give this argument in more detail in section 7.
Lineage across 1 claim
Draws on · none recorded
This source
Drawn on by · none recordedLow-stakes alignment
in 1 claim's map
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- paulfchristiano
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/TPan9sQFuPP6jgEJo/low-stakes-alignment
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20260807111138/https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/TPan9sQFuPP6jgEJo/low-stakes-alignment
- Stored text
- 24,727 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 50 sections, 103 passages
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 11, 2026
History 3
- Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 152 parts by its own structure
- Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored