Minerval
Sourceunknowntext stored

Low-stakes alignment

paulfchristianoDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗Archived copy

Claims1
ExaminationsNone
Text50 sections
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNone recorded
Facts checked Nov 11, 2026
ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 1 claim's map0 sources downstream across 1 claim
EvidenceNot yet read
ReviewsNot reviewed

Examinations

None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.

Text103 passages · 1 marked

No examination yetMarked passage
45

The main substantive claim is that we don’t need to worry about the “distributional shift” between past decisions and future decisions. When the distribution of inputs change, the system may behave poorly for a while, but if we keep retraining on the new data then it will eventually adapt. If individual decisions are low stakes, then the total cost of all of this adaptation is small. I give this argument in more detail in section 7.

Lineage across 1 claim

Draws on · none recorded
This source
Low-stakes alignment
in 1 claim's map
Drawn on by · none recorded

Record

Kind
unknown
Authors
paulfchristiano
Publisher
Not recorded
Published
Not recorded
DOI
None
Link
https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/TPan9sQFuPP6jgEJo/low-stakes-alignment
Archived copy
https://web.archive.org/web/20260807111138/https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/TPan9sQFuPP6jgEJo/low-stakes-alignment
Stored text
24,727 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 50 sections, 103 passages
Claims extracted
Not recorded
Versions
One known
Copies
None recorded
Corrections
None recorded
Facts checked
Nov 11, 2026

History 3

  1. Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 152 parts by its own structure
  2. Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
  3. Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored