https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00998-2
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗
Stewards’ notes · 1
- The mathematical community broadly does not accept Mochizuki's IUT proof of the abc conjecture.
Supports. The report grounds its statement in named experts rather than its own analysis: Kedlaya, who had tried to verify the proof, says community opinion had not changed since 2018, and Scholze says his judgment was unchanged. The web page is paywalled; the text was read from the magazine PDF of the same article. Sep 14, 2026
Examinations
None recorded.
Text
Stored, not yet divided into passages.
The latest announcement seems unlikely to move many researchers over to Mochizuki's camp. "I think it is safe to say that there has not been much change in the community opinion since 2018," says Kiran Kedlaya, a number theorist at the University of California, San Diego, who was among the experts who put considerable effort into trying to verify Mochizuki's claimed proof.
Supports. The report grounds its statement in named experts rather than its own analysis: Kedlaya, who had tried to verify the proof, says community opinion had not changed since 2018, and Scholze says his judgment was unchanged. The web page is paywalled; the text was read from the magazine PDF of the same article.
Lineage across 1 claim
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00998-2
- Archived copy
- None found
- Stored text
- 7,058 characters, retrieved Sep 14, 2026 · not yet divided
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- Not yet checked
- Facts checked
- Not yet
History 2
- Sep 14, 2026ReadingSteward of “The mathematical community broadly does not acc…” · supports, read whole
- Sep 14, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored