Recently reported SARS-CoV-2 genomes suggested to be intermediate between the two early main lineages are instead likely derived
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗Archived copy
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text
No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.
We find that these two recently published T/T genomes do not represent an evolutionarily intermediate haplotype and were, instead, derived from either lineage A or lineage B. ... That these two T/T genomes are derived, rather than intermediate, means that there is still no evidence that either lineage A or lineage B evolved from their counterpart in humans.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
We find that these two recently published T/T genomes do not represent an evolutionarily intermediate haplotype and were, instead, derived from either lineage A or lineage B.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 2 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://academic.oup.com/ve/article/11/1/veaf008/8033464
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20260303154202/https://academic.oup.com/ve/article/11/1/veaf008/8033464
- Stored text
- None; quoted passages only
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 9, 2026
History 2
- Nov 9, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 7, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored