Catastrophic Failure of LLM Unlearning via Quantization
Zhang, Zhiwei, Wang, Fali, Li, Xiaomin, Wu, Zongyu, Tang, Xianfeng, Liu, Hui, He, Qi, Yin, Wenpeng, Wang, SuhangarXiv.orgPublished Oct 21, 2024Original︎ ↗Archived copy
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text56 passages · 1 marked
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable proficiency in generating text, benefiting from extensive training on vast textual corpora. However, LLMs may also acquire unwanted behaviors from the diverse and sensitive nature of their training data, which can include copyrighted and private content. Machine unlearning has been introduced as a viable solution to remove the influence of such problematic content without the need for costly and time-consuming retraining. This process aims to erase specific knowledge from LLMs while preserving as much model utility as possible. Despite the effectiveness of current unlearning methods, little attention has been given to whether existing unlearning methods for LLMs truly achieve forgetting or merely hide the knowledge, which current unlearning benchmarks fail to detect. This paper reveals that applying quantization to models that have undergone unlearning can restore the "forgotten" information. To thoroughly evaluate this phenomenon, we conduct comprehensive experiments using various quantization techniques across multiple precision levels. We find that for unlearning methods with utility constraints, the unlearned model retains an average of 21\% of the intended forgotten knowledge in full precision, which significantly increases to 83\% after 4-bit quantization. ... Our code is available at: \href{ this https URL }{ this https URL }.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 4 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Zhang, Zhiwei, Wang, Fali, Li, Xiaomin, Wu, Zongyu, Tang, Xianfeng, Liu, Hui, He, Qi, Yin, Wenpeng, Wang, Suhang
- Publisher
- arXiv.org
- Published
- Oct 21, 2024
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16454
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20261006082223/https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16454
- Stored text
- 4,976 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 45 sections, 56 passages
- Claims extracted
- For
how much unlearned knowledge quantization restores, for which unlearning methods and precisions
· 4 claims (3 new) · Nov 11, 2026 for Reconciling conflicting published results on contested AI safety research questions
- For
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 11, 2026
History 3
- Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 101 parts by its own structure
- Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored