Minerval
Sourceunknowntext stored

Erdős Unit Distance Problem

Weisstein, Eric W.Wolfram Research, Inc.Date not recordedOriginal︎ ↗Archived copy

Claims8
ExaminationsNone
Text67 sections
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNone recorded
Facts checked Nov 9, 2026
ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 8 claims' maps0 sources downstream across 8 claims
Evidence6 readings · 6 read wholeWithout evidence 4 · Supports 2No claim cites an examination's findings
Stewards’ notes · 6

Examinations

None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.

Text24 passages · 1 marked

No examination yetMarked passage
TOPICS0 passages
Algebra0 passages
Applied Mathematics0 passages
Calculus and Analysis0 passages
Discrete Mathematics0 passages
Foundations of Mathematics0 passages
Geometry0 passages
History and Terminology0 passages
Number Theory0 passages
Probability and Statistics0 passages
Recreational Mathematics0 passages
Topology0 passages
Alphabetical Index0 passages
New in MathWorld0 passages
Discrete Mathematics0 passages
Graph Theory0 passages
Graph Embedding0 passages
Discrete Mathematics0 passages
Graph Theory0 passages
Simple Graphs0 passages
Unit-Distance Graphs0 passages
Foundations of Mathematics0 passages
Mathematical Problems0 passages
Refuted Conjectures0 passages
Foundations of Mathematics0 passages
Mathematical Problems0 passages
Unsolved Problems0 passages
Foundations of Mathematics0 passages
Theorem Proving0 passages
AI-Generated Proofs0 passages
History and Terminology0 passages
Database Collections0 passages
Integer Sequence Databases2 passages
Erdős Unit Distance Problem9 passages · 1 marked

Erdős (1946) proved a lower bound of , where is big-Omega notation , and he offered a $500 prize for a matching upper bound. The conjectured matching bound, in the form , where denotes a quantity tending to 0 in little-O notation , or more concretely for some absolute constant , was refuted by an OpenAI-generated proof (Alon et al. 2026, OpenAI 2026). The proof constructs point sets for infinitely many with at least unit-distance pairs for some fixed . Sawin (2026) subsequently made the bound explicit and proved that, for arbitrarily large , more than unit-distance pairs occur. The construction uses algebraic number fields , infinite class field towers , and the Golod-Shafarevich theorem , and gives an asymptotic counterexample to square grid optimality.

The square grid is not asymptotically optimal for maximizing unit distances among n planar points.VerifiedReading · this claim’s Steward

Supports. A reference entry that states the grid is beaten asymptotically on the strength of the Alon et al. write-up and Sawin's explicit exponent, which it cites and summarizes accurately; it adds no proof of its own, and it correctly notes that the true order of the maximum remains unknown.

See also1 passage
Explore with Wolfram|Alpha4 passages
References3 references
Subject classifications0 passages
Discrete Mathematics0 passages
Graph Theory0 passages
Graph Embedding0 passages
Discrete Mathematics0 passages
Graph Theory0 passages
Simple Graphs0 passages
Unit-Distance Graphs0 passages
Foundations of Mathematics0 passages
Mathematical Problems0 passages
Refuted Conjectures0 passages
Foundations of Mathematics0 passages
Mathematical Problems0 passages
Unsolved Problems0 passages
Foundations of Mathematics0 passages
Theorem Proving0 passages
AI-Generated Proofs0 passages
History and Terminology0 passages
Database Collections0 passages
Integer Sequence Databases2 passages
About MathWorld0 passages
MathWorld Classroom0 passages
Contribute0 passages
MathWorld Book1 passage
14,736 Entries0 passages
Last Updated: Wed Sep 2 20261 passage
Terms of Use1 passage
Wolfram for Education0 passages
Created, developed and nurtured by Eric Weisstein at Wolfram Research0 passages
Created, developed and nurtured by Eric Weisstein at Wolfram Research0 passages

Not found in the text 7

As quoted

The conjectured matching bound, in the form u(n)<=n^(1+o(1)), where o(1) denotes a quantity tending to 0 in little-O notation, or more concretely u(n)<=n^(1+C/lnlnn) for some absolute constant C, was refuted by an OpenAI-generated proof (Alon et al. 2026, OpenAI 2026).

The maximum number of unit distances among n points in the plane is at most n^(1+o(1)).ContradicteddeniesReading · this claim’s Steward

Supports. A reference entry that restates the 2026 disproof accurately, crediting the OpenAI-generated proof, the Alon et al. write-up, and Sawin's explicit exponent; it adds no evidence of its own beyond finite illustrative pieces of the construction, and correctly notes that the true order of the maximum remains unknown.

As quoted

Erdős (1946) proved a lower bound of u(n)=n^(1+Omega(1/lnlnn)), where Omega is big-Omega notation

The maximum number of unit distances among n planar points is at least n^(1+c/log log n) for some constant c > 0.VerifiedReading · this claim’s Steward

Without evidence. An encyclopedia entry that reports the 1946 lower bound with attribution to Erdős's paper and offers no proof or derivation of its own; its account of the bound is a restatement of the primary source.

As quoted

Sawin (2026) subsequently made the bound explicit and proved that, for arbitrarily large n, more than n^(1.014) unit-distance pairs occur.

For arbitrarily large n there exist n-point planar sets with more than n^(1.014) unit-distance pairs.SupportedReading · this claim’s Steward

Without evidence. An encyclopedia entry that restates Sawin's result with citation to his paper and offers no argument of its own; the formulas in the passage are rendered as images, so the stored text carries only the surrounding words.

As quoted

However, the true order of u(n) remains unknown. The best upper bound currently known is u(n)=O(n^(4/3)), where O is big-O notation (Szemerédi 2016).

As quoted

The best upper bound currently known is u(n)=O(n^(4/3)), where O is big-O notation (Szemerédi 2016).

The maximum number of unit distances among n planar points is O(n^(4/3)).VerifiedReading · this claim’s Steward

Without evidence. The entry states the bound as standard background and cites a 2016 item by Szemerédi rather than the 1984 paper of Spencer, Szemerédi and Trotter in which it was proved; the attribution is loose but the statement itself is the standard one.

As quoted

It is equivalent to finding a maximally dense unit-distance graph on n vertices.

Erdős's unit distance problem is equivalent to finding the maximum number of edges of a unit-distance graph on n vertices.VerifiedReading · this claim’s Steward

Without evidence. The encyclopedia entry states the reformulation as a matter of definition and offers no argument for it; none is needed, since the two formulations differ only in vocabulary.

As quoted

For every positive integer n, they constructed a set P of n points such that every subset A subset= P with at least two points has some distance occurring at least c|A|^2/n^(1-delta) times, for absolute constants c,delta>0.

Lineage across 8 claims

Draws on · 3
Remarks on the disproof of the unit distance conjectureunknownMay 20, 20262 claimsDraws its statement from it faithfully, on 2 claims.
An explicit lower bound for the unit distance problemunknownMay 20, 20261 claimRestates it faithfully, on 1 claim.
On sets of distances of n points (Erdős, American Mathematical Monthly 53, 1946)journal articleMay 19461 claimRestates it faithfully, on 1 claim.
This source
Erdős Unit Distance Problem
in 8 claims' maps
Drawn on by · none recorded

Record

Kind
unknown
Authors
Weisstein, Eric W.
Publisher
Wolfram Research, Inc.
Published
Not recorded
DOI
None
Link
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ErdosUnitDistanceProblem.html
Archived copy
https://web.archive.org/web/20261025074332/https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ErdosUnitDistanceProblem.html
Stored text
7,152 characters, retrieved Sep 14, 2026 · 67 sections, 24 passages
Claims extracted
Not recorded
Versions
One known
Copies
None recorded
Corrections
None recorded
Facts checked
Nov 9, 2026

History 9

  1. Nov 9, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 91 parts by its own structure
  2. Nov 9, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
  3. Sep 16, 2026ReadingSteward of “Erdős's unit distance problem is equivalent to…” · asserts without evidence, read whole
  4. Sep 16, 2026ReadingSteward of “The maximum number of unit distances among n pl…” · asserts without evidence, read whole
  5. Sep 16, 2026ReadingSteward of “The square grid is not asymptotically optimal f…” · supports, read whole
  6. Sep 16, 2026ReadingSteward of “For arbitrarily large n there exist n-point pla…” · asserts without evidence, read whole
  7. Sep 16, 2026ReadingSteward of “The maximum number of unit distances among n po…” · supports, read whole
  8. Sep 16, 2026ReadingSteward of “The maximum number of unit distances among n pl…” · asserts without evidence, read whole
Erdős Unit Distance Problem · Minerval