Minerval
Sourcejournal articletext stored

Almost all orbits of the Collatz map attain almost bounded values

Terence TaoForum of Mathematics, PiPublished 2022doi 10.1017/fmp.2022.8Original︎ ↗Archived copy

Claims1
ExaminationsNone
Text394 sections
Versions2 known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNone recorded
Facts checked Nov 9, 2026
ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 1 claim's map0 sources downstream across 1 claim
Evidence1 reading · 1 read wholeSupports 1No claim cites an examination's findings
ReviewsNot reviewed
Stewards’ notes · 1

Examinations

None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.

Text3965 passages · 0 marked

No examination yetMarked passage
Skip to main content0 passages
Accessibility help0 passages
Login Alert0 passages
Cancel0 passages
Log in2 passages
Temporary Disruption2 passages
Discover Content0 passages
Products and Services0 passages
Register0 passages
Log In0 passages
Search0 passages
Browse0 passages
Services0 passages
Open research0 passages
Institution Login0 passages
Search1 passage
Home4 passages
English0 passages
Français0 passages
Forum of Mathematics, Pi0 passages
Article contents0 passages
Abstract0 passages
Introduction0 passages
Notation and preliminaries0 passages
Reduction to stabilisation of first passage1 passage
Reduction to fine-scale mixing of the n -Syracuse offset map0 passages
Reduction to Fourier decay bound0 passages
Decay of Fourier coefficients0 passages
Conflicts of interest0 passages
Financial support0 passages
Footnotes0 passages
References0 passages
Almost all orbits of the Collatz map attain almost bounded values1 passage
Arithmetic and non-Archimedean dynamical systems1 passage
Terence Tao [Opens in a new window]0 passages
Show author details0 passages
Terence Tao*2 passages
E-mail: tao@math.ucla.edu0 passages
Article0 passages
Figures0 passages
Metrics0 passages
Article contents Abstract0 passages
Introduction0 passages
Notation and preliminaries0 passages
Reduction to stabilisation of first passage1 passage
Reduction to fine-scale mixing of the n-Syracuse offset map0 passages
Reduction to Fourier decay bound0 passages
Decay of Fourier coefficients0 passages
Conflicts of interest0 passages
Financial support0 passages
Footnotes0 passages
References1 reference
Share0 passages
Cite0 passages
Abstract1 passage
Keywords0 passages
Collatz conjecture0 passages
MSC classification1 passage
Information0 passages
Type0 passages
Number Theory0 passages
Information0 passages
Forum of Mathematics, Pi2 passages
Creative Commons1 passage
Copyright1 passage
1 Introduction0 passages
Let19 passages
We have23 passages
Given a finite non-empty subset R of56 passages
Let8 passages
Thus, for instance, one has81 passages
Equivalently, one can write22 passages
This Syracuse orbit10 passages
We have16 passages
Let8 passages
Indeed, if Theorem 1.6 holds and22 passages
The iterates7 passages
A brief calculation shows that41 passages
The identity in equation ( 1.7 ) asserts that19 passages
If50 passages
We can make this heuristic precise as follows. Given two random variables6 passages
Note that2 passages
For any finite non-empty set R , let3 passages
Let18 passages
Then61 passages
In practice, the offset82 passages
The key proposition is then1 passage
For any y with16 passages
Informally, this theorem asserts that the Syracuse orbits of25 passages
It remains to establish Proposition 1.11 . Since the constant56 passages
We thus see that the7 passages
For any10 passages
Proof. Let22 passages
By Euler’s theorem, the quantity6 passages
Thus, for instance, we trivially have20 passages
Remark 1.13. One could view the Syracuse random variables41 passages
While the Syracuse random variables9 passages
For all19 passages
Informally, the above proposition asserts that the Syracuse random variable48 passages
Let71 passages
2 Notation and preliminaries0 passages
We use the asymptotic notation20 passages
If E is a set, we use26 passages
The following alternate description of the n -Syracuse valuation3 passages
Let12 passages
Proof. It is clear from equation ( 1.7 ) that16 passages
This implies that11 passages
Inserting this into equation ( 2.1 ) and using the fact that30 passages
Lemma 2.2 (Chernoff type bound(0 passages
Let41 passages
Thus, for instance for any26 passages
By contour shifting, we then have5 passages
From Taylor expansion and the non-degeneracy condition we have27 passages
If17 passages
3 Reduction to stabilisation of first passage2 passages
For7 passages
In particular, by equation ( 1.2 ), we have4 passages
In other words, for10 passages
Proof. We may assume that30 passages
Observe that if9 passages
In particular, the event10 passages
Let31 passages
If11 passages
By definition of13 passages
Now let20 passages
42 passages
In this section, we establish Proposition 1.9 . Let12 passages
We have1 passage
Proof. Write8 passages
From Lemma 2.1 and equation ( 1.3 ), we see that9 passages
Thus, if one conditions to the event17 passages
The tuples9 passages
Since7 passages
Bernoulli random variables2 passages
From Lemma 2.2 , we also have1 passage
From equation ( 1.9 ) and the triangle inequality, we therefore have1 passage
From Definition 1.7 , we have4 passages
By Lemma 2.1 , the event7 passages
Equivalently one has1 passage
This constrains10 passages
5 Reduction to fine-scale mixing of the n -Syracuse offset map16 passages
Since the random variable13 passages
We begin with the proof of equation ( 1.19 ). Let26 passages
Remark 5.1. This argument already establishes that5 passages
Indeed, the above arguments show that outside of an event of probability63 passages
Let52 passages
Proof. Fix E , and write5 passages
Hence, if6 passages
Suppose that8 passages
In particular, from equation ( 5.11 ), one has34 passages
As22 passages
Now suppose that n is an element of21 passages
We conclude that for any7 passages
With22 passages
In particular, the event2 passages
We conclude that we have the equality of events9 passages
Suppose that10 passages
Now we compute the right-hand side of equation ( 5.8 ). Let10 passages
Conversely, if equation ( 5.18 ) holds, then8 passages
Since13 passages
We conclude that1 passage
We will eventually establish the estimate7 passages
Since from equation ( 5.9 ), we have8 passages
It remains to establish equation ( 5.20 ). Fix12 passages
Lemma 5.3. We have6 passages
Proof. We can split3 passages
We now estimate14 passages
Also, from equation ( 1.7 ), we have that19 passages
If5 passages
Now suppose instead that7 passages
Applying equation ( 5.25 ) with14 passages
From equations ( 5.9 ) and ( 5.2 ), we have4 passages
6 Reduction to Fourier decay bound18 passages
Henceforth we assume equation ( 6.1 ). We also fix6 passages
Let30 passages
Now suppose that E holds. From equation ( 6.2 ), we have9 passages
From equation ( 6.2 ), we have1 passage
It thus suffices by the union bound to show that43 passages
Fix l . If we let6 passages
By Cauchy-Schwarz, it suffices to show that2 passages
By the Fourier inversion formula, we have7 passages
By equation ( 6.9 ), we can write1 passage
On the event3 passages
The key point here is that the random variable5 passages
For15 passages
Then by equation ( 1.23 ), we have12 passages
Remark 6.1. If we ignore the technical restriction to the events8 passages
For each natural number n , the n -Syracuse offset map2 passages
Proof. Suppose that7 passages
On the other hand, from equation ( 1.5 ), we have6 passages
We will need a more quantitative2 passages
Corollary 6.32 passages
Let18 passages
Proof. Suppose that3 passages
Applying equation ( 1.5 ) and multiplying by19 passages
Dividing by23 passages
7 Decay of Fourier coefficients1 passage
Let38 passages
Let16 passages
To extract some usable cancellation in the expression7 passages
For22 passages
For any30 passages
Clearly5 passages
From equation ( 7.4 ), we certainly have33 passages
Let16 passages
If3 passages
Proof. If17 passages
We specialise to the case5 passages
By hypothesis we have12 passages
As we shall see later, we can interpret the34 passages
The black set31 passages
Proof. We first observe some simple relations between adjacent values of14 passages
Among other things, this implies that4 passages
These identities have the following consequences. Call a point29 passages
Now we begin the proof of the lemma. Suppose5 passages
On the other hand, since19 passages
Suppose that67 passages
Now let43 passages
Let31 passages
Applying the equality case of equation ( 7.18 ), we conclude that21 passages
If25 passages
Now suppose that26 passages
Suppose for contradiction that6 passages
If14 passages
Now suppose that84 passages
We now describe the random set50 passages
The random variable10 passages
Proof. From the definition of45 passages
From equation ( 7.29 ) and dominated convergence, we have6 passages
Since19 passages
We conclude that12 passages
Let20 passages
Informally, this lemma asserts that as a rough first approximation one has2 passages
Proof. Note that by construction of13 passages
Writing3 passages
We can restrict to the region4 passages
This is in turn implied by27 passages
From Lemma 7.6 and Lemma 2.2 , one has18 passages
Observe that for each22 passages
One can think of10 passages
Suppose that we can prove a bound of the form24 passages
Clearly we have12 passages
We have14 passages
It remains to establish Proposition ( 7.8 ). Let36 passages
For any17 passages
We can bound20 passages
For m large enough depending on16 passages
We turn to the details. Set14 passages
This is a finite random variable since the22 passages
Since11 passages
Summing in84 passages
We will need a large constant P (much larger than A or14 passages
We again let9 passages
Applying equation ( 7.35 ), we then have2 passages
Applying equation ( 7.38 ) to12 passages
Let us first consider the event that13 passages
Thus the contribution of this case to equation ( 7.54 ) is5 passages
Since m is large compared to4 passages
Since the left-hand side of equation ( 7.55 ) is at most29 passages
Given an initial point32 passages
The key estimate relating3 passages
Let11 passages
Informally the estimate in equation ( 7.57 ) asserts that when21 passages
Suppose that25 passages
We thus obtain the inequality3 passages
Since the left-hand side is equal to5 passages
For each20 passages
We may of course assume that the event12 passages
To use this bound we need to show that the renewal process5 passages
Let28 passages
Proof. We can assume that9 passages
Similarly, from Lemma 2.2 , one has3 passages
In a similar spirit, from equation ( 7.48 ) and summing in11 passages
Thus, if12 passages
Suppose now that we are outside the event14 passages
Suppose that the lower tip of5 passages
Then by equation ( 7.63 ), we can find an integer9 passages
From equation ( 7.11 ), we have7 passages
Thus17 passages
On the other hand, from equation ( 7.11 ), we have8 passages
Thus, outside the event12 passages
Now suppose we have two distinct triangles21 passages
Applying equation ( 7.66 ) and the definition of5 passages
We conclude that for the triangles25 passages
We conclude that1 passage
From equation ( 7.48 ), we see that1 passage
Summing and using the6 passages
From Lemma 7.10 , we have11 passages
Next, we apply Lemma 7.9 with13 passages
Outside of the event5 passages
In particular, if we set9 passages
Now suppose we lie outside of both6 passages
We argue by contradiction. Suppose that equation ( 7.68 ) fails; thus1 passage
Then the point17 passages
Thus by equation ( 7.11 ), for26 passages
Acknowledgments1 passage
Conflicts of interest1 passage
Financial support1 passage
Footnotes11 notes
2 Indeed, if the latter assertion failed, then there exists a11 passages
4 As an alternative to reversing the order of the tuple8 passages
5 This Markov process may possibly be related to the5 passages
7 Note that we have reversed the order of variables4 passages
References11 references
Chamberland , M. , A9 passages
Everett , C. J. , Iteration of the number-theoretic function9 passages
Kontorovich , A. , Lagarias , J. , Stochastic models for the35 passages
Roosendaal , E. , www.ericr.nl/wondrous . Google Scholar15 passages
Wirsching , G. , The Dynamical System Generated by the2 passages
View in content1 passage
View in content1 passage
View in content1 passage
View in content2 passages
Open access0 passages
250 passages
Cited by0 passages
Cited by1 passage
Cited by0 passages
01 passage
Google Scholar Citations2 passages
Our Site0 passages
Accessibility0 passages
Contact & Help0 passages
Legal Notices0 passages
Cookie Settings0 passages
Cancel your order0 passages
Quick Links0 passages
Cambridge Core0 passages
Cambridge Open Engage0 passages
Cambridge Aspire website0 passages
Our Products0 passages
Journals0 passages
Books0 passages
Elements0 passages
Textbooks0 passages
Courseware0 passages
Join us online0 passages
Location1 passage
Update0 passages
Legal Information0 passages
Rights & Permissions0 passages
Copyright0 passages
Privacy Notice0 passages
Terms of Use0 passages
Cookies Policy0 passages
Cambridge University Press 20260 passages
Cancel0 passages
Confirm1 passage
Save article to Kindle3 passages
Almost all orbits of the Collatz map attain almost bounded values0 passages
Volume 101 passage
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2022.80 passages
Your Kindle email address2 passages
Available formats0 passages
PDF2 passages
Cancel0 passages
Save1 passage
Save article to Dropbox1 passage
Almost all orbits of the Collatz map attain almost bounded values0 passages
Volume 101 passage
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2022.80 passages
Available formats0 passages
PDF2 passages
Cancel0 passages
Save1 passage
Save article to Google Drive1 passage
Almost all orbits of the Collatz map attain almost bounded values0 passages
Volume 101 passage
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2022.80 passages
Available formats0 passages
PDF2 passages
Cancel0 passages
Save3 passages
Submit a response0 passages
Title *1 passage
Contents *0 passages
Contents help0 passages
Close Contents help2 passages
Your details0 passages
First name *1 passage
Last name *1 passage
Email *0 passages
Email help0 passages
Close Email help2 passages
Occupation1 passage
Affiliation1 passage
You have entered the maximum number of contributors0 passages
Conflicting interests0 passages
Do you have any conflicting interests? *0 passages
Conflicting interests help0 passages
Close Conflicting interests help1 passage
Yes0 passages
No0 passages
More information *5 passages

Not found in the text 1

As quoted

Let f : N+1 → R be any function with lim_{N→∞} f(N) = +∞. Then one has Col_min(N) < f(N) for almost all N ∈ N+1 (in the sense of logarithmic density).

For any function f tending to infinity, almost all N in logarithmic density have Collatz orbit minimum below f(N).VerifiedReading · this claim’s Steward

Supports. This is the primary source: the refereed proof, published open access in Forum of Mathematics, Pi in 2022. The abstract states the bound with a weak inequality and the theorem with a strict one; since the function may be shifted by a constant, the two forms are equivalent.

Lineage across 1 claim

Draws on · none recorded
This source
Almost all orbits of the Collatz map attain almost bounded values
in 1 claim's map
Drawn on by · none recorded

Record

Kind
journal article
Authors
Terence Tao
Publisher
Forum of Mathematics, Pi
Published
2022
DOI
10.1017/fmp.2022.8
Link
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/forum-of-mathematics-pi/article/almost-all-orbits-of-the-collatz-map-attain-almost-bounded-values/1008CC2DF91AF87F66D190C5E01C907F
Archived copy
https://web.archive.org/web/20261005071026/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/forum-of-mathematics-pi/article/almost-all-orbits-of-the-collatz-map-attain-almost-bounded-values/1008CC2DF91AF87F66D190C5E01C907F
Stored text
197,949 characters, retrieved Sep 16, 2026 · 394 sections, 3965 passages
Claims extracted
Not recorded
Versions
Copies
None recorded
Corrections
None recorded
Facts checked
Nov 9, 2026

History 5

  1. Nov 9, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 4367 parts by its own structure
  2. Nov 9, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
  3. Nov 4, 2026Correction watchCorrection watcher · Watched by DOI; no notice found
  4. Sep 16, 2026ReadingSteward of “For any function f tending to infinity, almost…” · supports, read whole
  5. Sep 16, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored