Teaching Claude Why
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗Archived copy
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text272 passages · 1 marked
When safety training distributions provide insufficient coverage, we hypothesize that the model tends to revert to the pretraining prior in terms of behavior.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not found in the text 1
There were gaps in our safety training that led to Claude not appropriately learn how it should behave in the agentic misalignment scenarios and reverting to its pretraining prior. We now think that the third answer is largely responsible ... In the agentic misalignment eval, this means that Claude views the prompt as the beginning of a dramatic story and reverts to prior expectations from pre-training data about how an AI assistant would behave in this scenario. Indeed, we see that misalignment propensity is significantly higher when the name of the AI in the story is not Claude.
Lineage across 2 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://alignment.anthropic.com/2026/teaching-claude-why/
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20261030130901/https://alignment.anthropic.com/2026/teaching-claude-why/
- Stored text
- 78,267 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 36 sections, 272 passages
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 11, 2026
History 3
- Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 308 parts by its own structure
- Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored