Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning
Hu, Shengyuan, Fu, Yiwei, Wu, Zhiwei Steven, Smith, VirginiaarXiv.orgPublished Jun 19, 2024Original︎ ↗Archived copy
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text59 passages · 1 marked
Abstract: Machine unlearning is a promising approach to mitigate undesirable memorization of training data in ML models. However, in this work we show that existing approaches for unlearning in LLMs are surprisingly susceptible to a simple set of $\textit{benign relearning attacks}$. With access to only a small and potentially loosely related set of data, we find that we can ''jog'' the memory of unlearned models to reverse the effects of unlearning. For example, we show that relearning on public medical articles can lead an unlearned LLM to output harmful knowledge about bioweapons, and relearning general wiki information about the book series Harry Potter can force the model to output verbatim memorized text. We formalize this unlearning-relearning pipeline, explore the attack across three popular unlearning benchmarks, and discuss future directions and guidelines that result from our study. Our work indicates that current approximate unlearning methods simply suppress the model outputs and fail to robustly forget target knowledge in the LLMs.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 4 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Hu, Shengyuan, Fu, Yiwei, Wu, Zhiwei Steven, Smith, Virginia
- Publisher
- arXiv.org
- Published
- Jun 19, 2024
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13356
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20261023111447/https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13356
- Stored text
- 4,749 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 45 sections, 59 passages
- Claims extracted
- For
whether fine-tuning on small or loosely related data restores unlearned knowledge, for which methods and benchmarks, and with how much data
· 4 claims (2 new) · Nov 11, 2026 for Reconciling conflicting published results on contested AI safety research questions
- For
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 11, 2026
History 3
- Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 104 parts by its own structure
- Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored