Distillation Robustifies Unlearning
Lee, Bruce W., Foote, Addie, Infanger, Alex, Shor, Leni, Kamath, Harish, Goldman-Wetzler, Jacob, Woodworth, Bryce, Cloud, Alex, Turner, Alexander MattarXiv.orgPublished Jun 6, 2025Original︎ ↗Archived copy
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text57 passages · 1 marked
Abstract: Current LLM unlearning methods are not robust. A few steps of finetuning can revert their effects. We begin by showing that this is true even for an idealized form of unlearning: training to imitate a model that was never trained on unwanted information. This shows that training a model can drastically modify its input-output behavior while leaving its underlying capabilities intact. In light of this dynamic, we show our main result. Training a randomly initialized student on the outputs of an unlearned model transfers behaviors while leaving latent capabilities behind. In short, distillation robustifies unlearning. Based on this result, we propose Unlearn-Noise-Distill-on-Outputs (UNDO), a scalable method that distills an unlearned model into a noised copy of itself. UNDO introduces a tunable tradeoff between compute cost and robustness, establishing a new Pareto frontier on synthetic language and arithmetic tasks. At its strongest setting, UNDO matches the robustness of a model retrained from scratch with perfect data filtering while using only 60-80% of the compute and requiring only 0.01% of the pretraining data to be labeled. We also show that UNDO robustifies unlearning on the more realistic Weapons of Mass Destruction Proxy (WMDP) benchmark. Since distillation is widely used in practice, incorporating an unlearning step beforehand offers a convenient path to robust capability removal.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 8 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Lee, Bruce W., Foote, Addie, Infanger, Alex, Shor, Leni, Kamath, Harish, Goldman-Wetzler, Jacob, Woodworth, Bryce, Cloud, Alex, Turner, Alexander Matt
- Publisher
- arXiv.org
- Published
- Jun 6, 2025
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06278
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20261017092753/https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06278
- Stored text
- 5,022 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 46 sections, 57 passages
- Claims extracted
- For
whether distilling an unlearned model into a re-initialized or noised student makes unlearning robust to relearning, on which tasks and models, against which attacks, and at what cost
· 8 claims (6 new) · Nov 11, 2026 for Reconciling conflicting published results on contested AI safety research questions
- For
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 11, 2026
History 3
- Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 103 parts by its own structure
- Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored