https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗
Examinations
None recorded.
Text
Stored, not yet divided into passages.
When developers are allowed to use AI tools, they take 19% longer to complete issues—a significant slowdown that goes against developer beliefs and expert forecasts.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
developers expected AI to speed them up by 24%
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
even after experiencing the slowdown, they still believed AI had sped them up by 20%
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
the 246 total completed issues give us (just enough) sufficient statistical power to reject the null hypothesis of zero speedup/slowdown
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
All alternative estimators evaluated yield similar results, suggesting that the slowdown result is robust to our empirical strategy.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Our RCT results are basically correct, and the benchmark scores and anecdotal reports are overestimates of model capability (possibly each for different reasons)
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
We investigate 20 potential factors that might explain the slowdown, finding evidence that 5 likely contribute
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
it seems plausible or likely that AI tools are useful in many other contexts different from our setting, for example, for less experienced developers, or for developers working in an unfamiliar codebase
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 8 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://metr.org/blog/2025-07-10-early-2025-ai-experienced-os-dev-study/
- Archived copy
- None found
- Stored text
- 20,087 characters, retrieved Aug 10, 2026 · not yet divided
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- Not yet checked
- Facts checked
- Not yet
History 1
- Aug 10, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored