Sourceunknownno stored text
https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/QYAfjdujzRv8hx6xo/unfaithful-reasoning-can-fool-chain-of-thought-monitoring
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗
Claims1
ExaminationsNone
TextNot stored
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNot checked
Facts not yet checkedReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 1 claim's map0 sources downstream across 1 claim
EvidenceNot yet read
Examinations
None recorded.
Text
No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.
As quoted
For non-subtle sabotage (like deleting files, exfiltrating secrets, or changing file permissions), which leave obvious traces in the code, CoT monitoring performed worse than action-only monitoring, sometimes by up to 44%.
For obvious sabotage, action-only monitoring can outperform chain-of-thought monitoring because models may rationalize sabotage deceptively.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 1 claim
Draws on · none recorded
This source
Drawn on by · none recordedhttps://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/QYAfjdujzRv8hx6xo/unfaithful-reasoning-can-fool-chai…
in 1 claim's map
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/QYAfjdujzRv8hx6xo/unfaithful-reasoning-can-fool-chain-of-thought-monitoring
- Archived copy
- None found
- Stored text
- None; quoted passages only
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- Not yet checked
- Facts checked
- Not yet
History 1
- Oct 30, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored