Weak-to-Strong Generalization under Distribution Shifts
Jeon, Myeongho, Sobotka, Jan, Choi, Suhwan, Brbić, MariaarXiv.orgPublished Oct 24, 2025Original︎ ↗Archived copy
Stewards’ notes · 1
- Strong pretrained language models fine-tuned on weak-model labels consistently outperform their weak supervisors.
Overstates. The paper's main results tables do not show the naive student often falling below its weak supervisor. Under distribution shift the naive student is below the weak model on one of three image datasets (fMoW, 25.68 against 26.18 percent) and above it on the other two, on all five text-classification pairings and on both preference-alignment settings. For language models the margins are small in places (68.60 against 68.17 on Amazon reviews, 26.00 against 25.70 on medical questions) but positive throughout. Other baselines, notably a Bayesian ensemble, do fall below the weak model. Only the experiments section was read; appendix results were not. Nov 11, 2026
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text55 passages · 1 marked
Abstract: As future superhuman models become increasingly complex, accurately supervising their behavior may exceed human capabilities. Recent works have demonstrated that in such scenarios, weak models can effectively supervise strong models, a phenomenon known as weak-to-strong generalization. However, we find that naive weak-to-strong generalization fails under distribution shifts, often leading to worse performance of the strong model than its weak supervisors. To address this, we propose RAVEN, a robust weak-to-strong generalization framework that dynamically learns the optimal combinations of weak models in addition to parameters of the strong model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of RAVEN on image classification, text classification, and preference alignment tasks. RAVEN outperforms alternative baselines by over 30% on out-of-distribution tasks while matching or surpassing existing methods on in-distribution tasks. Moreover, our results show that RAVEN assigns higher weights to more accurate weak models, demonstrating its ability to automatically identify trustworthy supervision.
Overstates. The paper's main results tables do not show the naive student often falling below its weak supervisor. Under distribution shift the naive student is below the weak model on one of three image datasets (fMoW, 25.68 against 26.18 percent) and above it on the other two, on all five text-classification pairings and on both preference-alignment settings. For language models the margins are small in places (68.60 against 68.17 on Amazon reviews, 26.00 against 25.70 on medical questions) but positive throughout. Other baselines, notably a Bayesian ensemble, do fall below the weak model. Only the experiments section was read; appendix results were not.
Lineage across 1 claim
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Jeon, Myeongho, Sobotka, Jan, Choi, Suhwan, Brbić, Maria
- Publisher
- arXiv.org
- Published
- Oct 24, 2025
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21332
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20260820150057/https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21332
- Stored text
- 4,712 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 46 sections, 55 passages
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 11, 2026
History 4
- Nov 11, 2026ReadingSteward of “Strong pretrained language models fine-tuned on…” · overstates, read whole
- Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 101 parts by its own structure
- Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored