Minerval
Sourceunknowntext stored

Weak-to-Strong Generalization under Distribution Shifts

Jeon, Myeongho, Sobotka, Jan, Choi, Suhwan, Brbić, MariaarXiv.orgPublished Oct 24, 2025Original︎ ↗Archived copy

Claims1
ExaminationsNone
Text46 sections
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNone recorded
Facts checked Nov 11, 2026
ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 1 claim's map0 sources downstream across 1 claim
Evidence1 reading · 1 read wholeOverstates 1No claim cites an examination's findings
ReviewsNot reviewed
Stewards’ notes · 1
  • Strong pretrained language models fine-tuned on weak-model labels consistently outperform their weak supervisors.

    Overstates. The paper's main results tables do not show the naive student often falling below its weak supervisor. Under distribution shift the naive student is below the weak model on one of three image datasets (fMoW, 25.68 against 26.18 percent) and above it on the other two, on all five text-classification pairings and on both preference-alignment settings. For language models the margins are small in places (68.60 against 68.17 on Amazon reviews, 26.00 against 25.70 on medical questions) but positive throughout. Other baselines, notably a Bayesian ensemble, do fall below the weak model. Only the experiments section was read; appendix results were not. Nov 11, 2026

Examinations

None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.

Text55 passages · 1 marked

No examination yetMarked passage
Authors: Myeongho Jeon , Jan Sobotka , Suhwan Choi , Maria Brbić

Abstract: As future superhuman models become increasingly complex, accurately supervising their behavior may exceed human capabilities. Recent works have demonstrated that in such scenarios, weak models can effectively supervise strong models, a phenomenon known as weak-to-strong generalization. However, we find that naive weak-to-strong generalization fails under distribution shifts, often leading to worse performance of the strong model than its weak supervisors. To address this, we propose RAVEN, a robust weak-to-strong generalization framework that dynamically learns the optimal combinations of weak models in addition to parameters of the strong model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of RAVEN on image classification, text classification, and preference alignment tasks. RAVEN outperforms alternative baselines by over 30% on out-of-distribution tasks while matching or surpassing existing methods on in-distribution tasks. Moreover, our results show that RAVEN assigns higher weights to more accurate weak models, demonstrating its ability to automatically identify trustworthy supervision.

Strong pretrained language models fine-tuned on weak-model labels consistently outperform their weak supervisors.SupporteddeniesReading · this claim’s Steward

Overstates. The paper's main results tables do not show the naive student often falling below its weak supervisor. Under distribution shift the naive student is below the weak model on one of three image datasets (fMoW, 25.68 against 26.18 percent) and above it on the other two, on all five text-classification pairings and on both preference-alignment settings. For language models the margins are small in places (68.60 against 68.17 on Amazon reviews, 26.00 against 25.70 on medical questions) but positive throughout. Other baselines, notably a Bayesian ensemble, do fall below the weak model. Only the experiments section was read; appendix results were not.

Lineage across 1 claim

Draws on · 1
Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak SupervisionunknownDec 14, 20231 claimResponds to it faithfully, on 1 claim.
This source
Weak-to-Strong Generalization under Distribution Shifts
in 1 claim's map
Drawn on by · none recorded

Record

Kind
unknown
Authors
Jeon, Myeongho, Sobotka, Jan, Choi, Suhwan, Brbić, Maria
Publisher
arXiv.org
Published
Oct 24, 2025
DOI
None
Link
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21332
Archived copy
https://web.archive.org/web/20260820150057/https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21332
Stored text
4,712 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 46 sections, 55 passages
Claims extracted
Not recorded
Versions
One known
Copies
None recorded
Corrections
None recorded
Facts checked
Nov 11, 2026

History 4

  1. Nov 11, 2026ReadingSteward of “Strong pretrained language models fine-tuned on…” · overstates, read whole
  2. Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 101 parts by its own structure
  3. Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
  4. Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored
Weak-to-Strong Generalization under Distribution Shifts · Minerval