Sourcejournal articleno stored text
Top Quark Mass Calibration for Monte Carlo Event Generators
Mathias Butenschoen, Bahman Dehnadi, André H. Hoang, Vicent Mateu, Moritz Preisser, Iain W. StewartPhysical Review LettersPublished Nov 29, 2016doi 10.1103/physrevlett.117.232001Original︎ ↗Archived copy
Claims1
ExaminationsNone
TextNot stored
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNone recorded
Facts checked Nov 9, 2026ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 1 claim's map0 sources downstream across 1 claim
EvidenceNot yet read
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text
No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.
As quoted
Fitting e+e− 2-jettiness calculations at next-to-leading-logarithmic and next-to-next-to-leading-logarithmic order to pythia 8.205, mtMC differs from the pole mass by 900 and 600 MeV, respectively, and agrees with the MSR mass within uncertainties, mtMC ≈ mt,1 GeV MSR.
Calibration studies find the Monte Carlo top-quark mass agrees with the MSR mass at 1 GeV within about 200 MeV
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 1 claim
Draws on · none recorded
This source
Drawn on by · none recordedTop Quark Mass Calibration for Monte Carlo Event Generators
in 1 claim's map
Record
- Kind
- journal article
- Authors
- Mathias Butenschoen, Bahman Dehnadi, André H. Hoang, Vicent Mateu, Moritz Preisser, Iain W. Stewart
- Publisher
- Physical Review Letters
- Published
- Nov 29, 2016
- DOI
- 10.1103/physrevlett.117.232001
- Link
- https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.232001
- Archived copy
- https://web.archive.org/web/20260908124441/https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.232001
- Stored text
- None; quoted passages only
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 9, 2026
History 3
- Nov 9, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 4, 2026Correction watchCorrection watcher · Watched by DOI; no notice found
- Aug 9, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored