https://blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2026/05/authorship-in-ai-age.html
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗
Stewards’ notes · 1
- An AI model that generates a verified mathematical result under human direction merits primary discovery credit
Without evidence. The post reasons from the Committee on Publication Ethics position that AI tools cannot take responsibility for work, and from thought experiments, to the view that a released model is a tool and that credit for even an autonomous AI mathematician's output goes to the person who built or deployed it. It is argument rather than evidence, and it is candid that the cases ahead are hard. Sep 13, 2026
Examinations
None recorded.
Text
Stored, not yet divided into passages.
What if someone builds an AI mathematician that doesn't take any prompts? It just reads papers and occasionally writes its own. Who is the author? That "someone".
Without evidence. The post reasons from the Committee on Publication Ethics position that AI tools cannot take responsibility for work, and from thought experiments, to the view that a released model is a tool and that credit for even an autonomous AI mathematician's output goes to the person who built or deployed it. It is argument rather than evidence, and it is candid that the cases ahead are hard.
Lineage across 1 claim
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2026/05/authorship-in-ai-age.html
- Archived copy
- None found
- Stored text
- 16,235 characters, retrieved Sep 13, 2026 · not yet divided
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- Not yet checked
- Facts checked
- Not yet
History 2
- Sep 13, 2026ReadingSteward of “An AI model that generates a verified mathemati…” · asserts without evidence, read whole
- Sep 13, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored