Sourceunknownno stored text
The Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research Ideas
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗
Claims1
ExaminationsNone
TextNot stored
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNone recorded
Facts checked Nov 11, 2026ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 1 claim's map0 sources downstream across 1 claim
EvidenceNot yet read
ReviewsNot reviewed
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text
No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.
As quoted
An execution study by recruiting 43 expert researchers to execute randomly-assigned ideas, finding that the scores of the LLM-generated ideas decrease significantly more than expert-written ideas on all evaluation metrics, closing the gap between ...
Current AI systems can reliably generate novel hypotheses in experimental science that survive validation.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 1 claim
Draws on · none recorded
This source
Drawn on by · none recordedThe Ideation-Execution Gap: Execution Outcomes of LLM-Generated versus Human Research Ide…
in 1 claim's map
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Ideation-Execution-Gap:-Execution-Outcomes-of-Si-Hashimoto/87e044b0cb5e43d630972afaf925af032efa61bd
- Archived copy
- None found
- Stored text
- None; quoted passages only
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- None recorded
- Facts checked
- Nov 11, 2026
History 2
- Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
- Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored