Minerval
Sourceunknownno stored text

A Taxonomy of Real-World Defeaters in Safety Assurance Cases

Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗

Claims2
ExaminationsNone
TextNot stored
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNot checked
Facts not yet checked
ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 2 claims' maps0 sources downstream across 2 claims
EvidenceNot yet read

Examinations

None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.

Text

No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.

As quoted

Moreover, generating defeaters is labor-intensive, relying heavily on the judgment and creativity of safety analysts, which can be prone to confirmation bias. There have been repeated calls for a systematic approach to identifying defeaters in assurance cases.

As quoted

assurance cases are fraught with challenges, such as incomplete evidence and gaps in reasoning, called defeaters, that can call into question the credibility and robustness of assurance cases. Identifying these defeaters increases confidence in the assurance case and can prevent catastrophic failures.

Lineage across 2 claims

Draws on · none recorded
This source
A Taxonomy of Real-World Defeaters in Safety Assurance Cases
in 2 claims' maps
Drawn on by · none recorded

Record

Kind
unknown
Authors
Not recorded
Publisher
Not recorded
Published
Not recorded
DOI
None
Link
https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00238
Archived copy
None found
Stored text
None; quoted passages only
Claims extracted
Not recorded
Versions
One known
Copies
None recorded
Corrections
Not yet checked
Facts checked
Not yet

History 1

  1. Aug 9, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored