A Taxonomy of Real-World Defeaters in Safety Assurance Cases
Author not recordedDate not recordedOriginal︎ ↗
Examinations
None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.
Text
No stored copy. Only the passages claims quote are recorded.
Moreover, generating defeaters is labor-intensive, relying heavily on the judgment and creativity of safety analysts, which can be prone to confirmation bias. There have been repeated calls for a systematic approach to identifying defeaters in assurance cases.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
assurance cases are fraught with challenges, such as incomplete evidence and gaps in reasoning, called defeaters, that can call into question the credibility and robustness of assurance cases. Identifying these defeaters increases confidence in the assurance case and can prevent catastrophic failures.
Not yet read by this claim’s Steward.
Lineage across 2 claims
Record
- Kind
- unknown
- Authors
- Not recorded
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Published
- Not recorded
- DOI
- None
- Link
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00238
- Archived copy
- None found
- Stored text
- None; quoted passages only
- Claims extracted
- Not recorded
- Versions
- One known
- Copies
- None recorded
- Corrections
- Not yet checked
- Facts checked
- Not yet
History 1
- Aug 9, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; no copy stored