Minerval
Sourceblog posttext stored

A simpler AI timelines model predicts 99% AI R&D automation in ~2032

Author not recordedMETR BlogPublished Feb 10, 2026Original︎ ↗Archived copy

Claims10
ExaminationsNone
Text75 sections
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNone recorded
Facts checked Nov 14, 2026
ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 10 claims' maps0 sources downstream across 10 claims
EvidenceNot yet read
ReviewsNot reviewed

Examinations

None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.

Text99 passages · 7 marked

No examination yetMarked passage
Subscribe

At current rates of compute growth and algorithmic progress, this model’s median prediction is >99% automation of AI R&D in late 2032. Most simulations result in a 1000x to 10,000,000x increase in AI efficiency and 300x-3000x research output by 2035. I therefore suspect that existing trends in compute growth and automation will still produce extremely powerful AI on “medium” timelines, even if the full coding automation and superhuman research taste that drive the AIFM’s “fast” timelines (superintelligence by ~mid-2031) don’t happen.

Subscribe

In particular, the “doubling difficulty growth factor”, which measures whether time horizon increases superexponentially, could change the date of automated coder from 2028 to 2049! I suspect that time horizon is too poorly defined to nail down this parameter, and rough estimates of more direct AI capability metrics like uplift can give much tighter confidence intervals.

NB David Rein thinks 2.1 to 4.2

f was between 0.25-0.5 in Jan 2026, implying between 1.33x and 2x uplift. This informs the value of $E_{hac}$.

Observations

The AI Futures model is complex, but its conclusions are fairly robust to simplifications.

The two key uncertainties behind timelines are

The median date of 99% automation is mid-2032. However, I don’t put too much weight on the exact predicted timelines because I haven’t thought much about the exact parameter values.

The two key uncertainties behind timelines are

A basic sensitivity analysis shows that higher beta (diminishing returns) and lower v (automation velocity) make 99% automation happen later, and the other parameters don’t affect things much.

Discussion

From playing around with this and other variations to the AI Futures model I think any reasonable timelines model will predict superhuman AI researchers before 2036 unless AI progress hits a wall or is deliberately slowed.

Lineage across 10 claims

Draws on · none recorded
This source
A simpler AI timelines model predicts 99% AI R&D automation in ~2032
in 10 claims' maps
Drawn on by · none recorded

Record

Kind
blog post
Authors
Not recorded
Publisher
METR Blog
Published
Feb 10, 2026
DOI
None
Link
https://metr.org/notes/2026-02-10-simpler-ai-timelines-model/
Archived copy
https://web.archive.org/web/20261103181105/https://metr.org/notes/2026-02-10-simpler-ai-timelines-model/
Stored text
17,786 characters, retrieved Nov 14, 2026 · 75 sections, 99 passages
Claims extracted
Versions
One known
Copies
None recorded
Corrections
None recorded
Facts checked
Nov 14, 2026

History 3

  1. Nov 14, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 174 parts by its own structure
  2. Nov 14, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
  3. Nov 14, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored