Minerval
Sourcepreprinttext stored

On the estimation and validity of AI time horizons: a statistical look at the METR plot

Nguyen, Drew T., Fithian, WilliamarXiv.orgPublished Oct 8, 2026Original︎ ↗Archived copy

Claims5
ExaminationsNone
Text46 sections
VersionsOne known
CopiesNone recorded
CorrectionsNone recorded
Facts checked Nov 11, 2026
ReachNo copies recorded
StructureIn 5 claims' maps0 sources downstream across 5 claims
EvidenceNot yet read
ReviewsNot reviewed

Examinations

None recorded. An examination is commissioned by a claim’s Steward for what its claim rests on; a review of the document for its own sake is asked for as a request bearing on it.

Text53 passages · 1 marked

No examination yetMarked passage
Authors: Drew T. Nguyen , William Fithian

Abstract: METR's 50\% time horizon measures the human completion time of software tasks that an AI solves with 50\% probability, allowing AI capabilities to be expressed in interpretable units. On 228 tasks and 26 AIs, we recompute the time horizons using splines and item-response theory to relax the assumption that the AI difficulty of a task depends linearly on the log of human time. Our fitted spline can be interpreted as a function that \emph{converts} human time to AI difficulty; it is nearly flat in a region from 2--30 min but close to linear elsewhere. Hence, a time-horizon jump from 3 min to 30 min is much easier than one from 30 min to 5 hours despite the same multiplier of $10 \times$. Overall, we contribute time-horizon point estimates that perform better under a cross-validated suite of proper scoring rules, as well as diagnostic plots for assessing time horizons' construct validity. We suggest that time horizons be interpreted together with the diagnostic plots, especially as new time-horizon-based benchmarks are proposed or existing ones grow to include longer tasks.

Not found in the text 1

As quoted

Our fitted spline can be interpreted as a function that converts human time to AI difficulty; it is nearly flat in a region from 2--30 min but close to linear elsewhere. Hence, a time-horizon jump from 3 min to 30 min is much easier than one from 30 min to 5 hours despite the same multiplier of 10x.

Lineage across 5 claims

Draws on · none recorded
This source
On the estimation and validity of AI time horizons: a statistical look at the METR plot
in 5 claims' maps
Drawn on by · none recorded

Record

Kind
preprint
Authors
Nguyen, Drew T., Fithian, William
Publisher
arXiv.org
Published
Oct 8, 2026
DOI
None
Link
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12466
Archived copy
https://web.archive.org/web/20261012074225/https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12466
Stored text
4,576 characters, retrieved Nov 11, 2026 · 46 sections, 53 passages
Claims extracted
Versions
One known
Copies
None recorded
Corrections
None recorded
Facts checked
Nov 11, 2026

History 3

  1. Nov 11, 2026DividedSegmenter · Divided into 99 parts by its own structure
  2. Nov 11, 2026FactsFacts fetcher · Facts looked up
  3. Nov 11, 2026Entered the graphEntered the graph; copy stored