Browse
Claims
Search the graph by meaning. Each result carries its current verdict; open one to see its decomposition, provenance, and the reasoning behind the assessment.
ShowingImportancePrizesTopicWuhan Institute of Virology
The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China: its coronavirus research program, technical capabilities, laboratory facilities and biosafety levels, personnel, publications, and viral collections (e.g., bat sarbecoviruses such as RaTG13), as these bear on discussions of SARS-CoV-2's origin and laboratory-related risk. Not claims about the DEFUSE proposal's content specifically.
SARS-CoV-2 has a laboratory origin
ContestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →causalA claim that one thing brings about another, not merely that the two go together.constitution →SARS-CoV-2 originimportance · centralImportance 0.90, from 0 to 1 · central: consequential and genuinely contested: a live crux. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
The Wuhan Institute of Virology operated reverse-genetics systems for constructing coronaviruses
VerifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →Coronavirus reverse geneticsVirologyimportance · minorImportance 0.30, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
The WIV engineered chimeric SARS-like coronaviruses
VerifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →Coronavirus reverse geneticsVirologyimportance · minorImportance 0.30, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
The WIV possessed unpublished bat coronavirus sequences that it did not disclose
SupportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →SARS-CoV-2 originUndisclosed coronavirus sequence dataimportance · notableImportance 0.50, from 0 to 1 · notable: a contested point in a live debate (also the default before judging). Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
The WIV took its bat virus sequence database offline in September 2019 and never republished it
SupportedEvidence favors the claim, but the chain is incomplete or the sources are secondary.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →Undisclosed coronavirus sequence dataSARS-CoV-2 originimportance · minorImportance 0.40, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
The WIV possessed or could have engineered a close progenitor of SARS-CoV-2
ContestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →empirical · verifiableA factual claim that could be checked directly against observation or primary records.constitution →SARS-CoV-2 originCoronavirus reverse geneticsimportance · majorImportance 0.65, from 0 to 1 · major: real consequence within a domain, actively argued. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
The WIV held undisclosed bat coronaviruses more similar to SARS-CoV-2 than those it published
UnsupportedNo credible evidence found, though the claim is not contradicted.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →SARS-CoV-2 originimportance · notableImportance 0.60, from 0 to 1 · notable: a contested point in a live debate (also the default before judging). Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
The WIV possessed or had access to a bat coronavirus sufficiently similar to SARS-CoV-2 to serve as an engineering backbone
ContestedCredible evidence or argument exists on multiple sides.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →SARS-CoV-2 originCoronavirus reverse geneticsimportance · notableImportance 0.60, from 0 to 1 · notable: a contested point in a live debate (also the default before judging). Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
The WIV had the technical capability to engineer a SARS-CoV-2-like coronavirus
VerifiedThe claim traces to reliable primary sources through a clear chain of evidence.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →Coronavirus reverse geneticsSARS-CoV-2 originimportance · minorImportance 0.40, from 0 to 1 · minor: narrow or largely settled, cheap to get right. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
The WIV possessed RaTG13, a bat coronavirus that was the closest known relative of SARS-CoV-2 at the time of the outbreak
UnassessedNo current assessment. Attention goes where its expected value is highest and someone funds it; nothing has funded an assessment of this claim yet, and anyone can.constitution →empirical · derivedA factual claim that rests on inference from other evidence rather than direct observation.constitution →SARS-CoV-2 originSARS-CoV-2 phylogeneticsimportance · settledImportance 0.15, from 0 to 1 · settled: uncontested, so low even when much depends on it. Higher-importance claims are worth more to assess, so funding reaches them sooner.constitution →
Contribute
If a claim here is wrong, or missing evidence, open it: every claim page carries its own entry for challenges, evidence, and corrections. If the graph is missing a claim entirely, propose it below. A proposal is reviewed on its merits; accepted claims are matched against the graph and enter it with their reasoning on record.